Debates, proposals, complaints, (dis)agreement with moderator's decisions

[Hatman 🍁]

How is my survivor less worthy than the survivor on Westerns or on Asterix? Neither are political, historical, etc.  You mention geography in the rules, I don't see how my new survivor is not geographical.

[Hatman 🍁]

Thank you, Jas.

My survivor is indeed geographical too, as I have divided the sports teams into geographical areas and will be eliminated based on geography.

Perhaps if it were a survivor dealing with players, then I can see your point (however, I object to your rules anyways, but my survivor does not break them)

[Hatman 🍁]

I think that bbf objected to that survivor because of its primary focus on athletics. It's just very hard to draw bright lines demarcating where "geography" and "history", encouraged themes, begin and where discouraged ones like athletics or popular culture (I suppose) end.

Well, I am more interested in the geographical nature of the survivor.

Sports teams and geography can go hand in hand, see the "CommonCensus" project: http://www.commoncensus.org/sports.php

It's very interesting to see what areas of the US support what sports teams.

A lot of choosing what sports teams to eliminate will be based on geography.

[Hatman 🍁]

Did you even visit this site? http://www.commoncensus.org/sports.php

This is a friggin' geography forum, and my survivor is of the interest of geography.

Please reconsider!

[Hatman 🍁]

Ugh.

Alright, you can move it.

But I am disappointed by your subjectivity. I'm still not satisfied with the ruling, and I will make no more survivors here out of protest.

[Hatman 🍁]

It appears to still be locked

[Hatman 🍁]

I'd play that.

My boycott on creating survivors stands though, until some new rules come out. And I have some pretty good ideas too.