WA: Rasmussen: Rossi (R) makes a comeback against Murray (D) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 01:27:41 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 Senatorial Election Polls
  WA: Rasmussen: Rossi (R) makes a comeback against Murray (D) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: WA: Rasmussen: Rossi (R) makes a comeback against Murray (D)  (Read 4488 times)
The Vorlon
Vorlon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,660


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -4.21

« on: September 30, 2010, 11:21:56 AM »

I have some vague impression that Rossi started a more focused media barrage. Did he?

Yes, Rossi is up on the air.  The RNSC is running as well.  "American Crossroads" has also reserved air time.

The GOP "thinks" this could be their #51 (they are diverting resources away from California) to fully fund the effort.

Mr. Moderate is correct re the Boeing ad.  Voters have gotten used to attack ads the really, really stretch the truth, but the Murray ad was just a flat out fabrication, and she will pay a (modest) price for it.
Logged
The Vorlon
Vorlon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,660


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -4.21

« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2010, 06:00:39 PM »

I have some vague impression that Rossi started a more focused media barrage. Did he?
The GOP "thinks" this could be their #51 (they are diverting resources away from California) to fully fund the effort.

Good for them that they've realized that Fiorina doesn't stand a chance. I like Angle and DioGuardi the best out of the Republican candidates in marginal states (which isn't saying much since I hate McMahon and Fiorina and don't care for Raese or Rossi), but I can understand that New York's media market is a money pit. However, couldn't the RNC run ads a lot cheaper in Nevada than in Washington?

The situation in Nevada is actually slowly drifting in Angles favour.

The logic, twisted though it may be, is basically as follows.

A) - Angle is a crazy lunatic.
B) - Reid is a mindless tool of Obama aiding and abetting the destruction of the nation.

A) is less dangerous than B)

Angle, however warped, would be 1% of 1/2 of 1/3rd of the power apparatus in Washington.  By herself she can do very little damage.  Harry Reid has actual levers of power that can hurt people.

Reid's numbers are actually mindly trending downward, he is now averaging about 45% in the polls (versus Angle at about 44%) which means Angle likley wins on election day.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.