Isn't an increasingly polarized and homogeneous map boring ? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 02:40:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  Isn't an increasingly polarized and homogeneous map boring ? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Isn't an increasingly polarized and homogeneous map boring ?  (Read 4359 times)
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
« on: October 23, 2010, 04:56:49 PM »

Perhaps inevitable. We are in a transition period where Democrats have become more northern and Republicans more southern, but it seems to be nearing its end. Landrieu and Pryor are the only deep south Democratic holdouts, while Snowe and Collins are the only New England (excluding NH) holdouts.

Regionalism is very prevalent in American politics, and always has been. Starting in 1960, however, the parties started to switch base regions, which caused a very unpolarized map for some time.

Here is the Senate following the 1920 election (from Wikipedia, sorry about the colors):


Now look a the Presidential election:


I think regional polarization can make it more boring, but it also has its own unique and interesting dynamics.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 13 queries.