US House Redistricting: General (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 03:13:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  US House Redistricting: General (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: US House Redistricting: General  (Read 138507 times)
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,659
United States


« on: July 22, 2019, 09:50:31 PM »
« edited: July 23, 2019, 09:19:32 PM by Nyvin »

Looking at the Twin Cities MN Metro, I think a least change map is actually quite possible for 2020 with 7 districts.   The 7 county area has enough population for 3.87 districts as of the 2018 estimates (and growing faster than the rest of the state),  so keeping MN-2 going southeast is actually perfect to fill in the rest.

2018 Estimates:

Anoka County
353813
Hennepin County
1259428
Total
1613241
Districts
2.01253373
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ramsey County
550210
Washington County
259201
Total
809411
Districts
1.00974804
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dakota County
425423
Carver County
103551
Scott County
147381
Rice County
66523
Goodhue County
46403
Wabasha County
21645
Total
810926
Districts
1.011638018

Both Hennepin districts already go into Anoka county anyway, so it makes sense that the rest of Anoka is added in with them.   Anoka and Hennepin will be just slightly over 2 districts in 2020.

Ramsey and Washington likewise are already together right now, and in 2020 they'll be almost exactly make 1 district together.

That leaves Dakota, Scott, and Carver in the 7 county Metro, which can be put together and add the rest of Rice county (already in MN-2 partially) and keep Goodhue and Wabasha for a bit above 1 district.

That leaves 4 districts in the Metro (or pretty close to it) and you end up with something like this:

https://davesredistricting.org/join/195772db-7c60-4d59-96cb-2f1560f2afd9

Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,659
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2019, 01:38:13 PM »

If the goal of the CA commission is to make competitive seats, why does it not follow a map similar to 538's redistricting?
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/redistricting-maps/california/#Competitive

Currently the 7 Safe GOP seats seem like a fig leaf.

Competitiveness isn't specifically spelled out in the commission's goals,  communities of interest is instead.   A lot of the GOP seats like the one in Northeastern CA and some of the San Diego/Orange County seats were either directly built as COI's or were surrounded by COI's and just got shaped by them.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,659
United States


« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2019, 09:39:51 PM »

Any chance of something like this passing in Oregon in 2021?

https://davesredistricting.org/join/b3a39d40-0280-41b6-bbd4-a3f1c423d267



Obviously the numbers aren't going to be precise, but the general idea is putting Salem and Eugene in one district.   The numbers actually work pretty well for the most part,  Washington and Yamhill are almost exactly one district with 2018 numbers.

Multnomah County
811880
Clackamas County
416075
Clatsop County
39764
Columbia County
52377
Tillamook County
26787
Total
1346883
Districts
1.928382593
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Washington County
597695
Yamhill County
107002
Total
704697
Districts
1.008940961
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Eugene (City)
171,245
Salem (City)
173,442
Benton County
92101
Lincoln County
49388
Polk County
85234
Total
571,410
Districts
0.818108995

I think the northwest rural counties are a bit ugly, but not terrible.  
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,659
United States


« Reply #3 on: July 24, 2019, 04:14:19 PM »

Most of Columbia's population is in the southeast and connected rather well to Metro Portland, I think it fits great with Multnomah.  

I don't think bringing Bend into the western districts is feasible, since Oregon state law prohibits "dividing Communities of Common Interests" and at some point (2000..?) all the counties east of the Cascades (including Hood River) are a COI.  

Clatsop and Tillamook probably don't go all that well with Multnomah, but they don't go well with anything really, even Washington.   Right now Clatsop is with OR-1 and Tillamook is in OR-5, which really doesn't make much sense, but again nothing really does with either one.  If anything they probably should all be grouped with a "Coastal Oregon" district going down to Lane County.  They're all pretty isolated.  

Probably the biggest problem is that Salem and Eugene would both want to have their own districts, rather than be lumped together.   Since Eugene has more Dem voters it would pretty much dominate the primary, thus the district.   Salem voters would hate that.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 12 queries.