A few YouGov (Internet) polls

[Tender Branson]

IL-Sen: 47% Giannoulias (D), 44% Kirk (R)

NV-Sen: 49% Angle (R), 47% Reid (D)

WA-Sen: 50% Murray (D), 47% Rossi (R)

WI-Sen: 52% Johnson (R), 46% Feingold (D)

MO-Sen: 54% Blunt (R), 42% Carnahan (D)

KY-Sen: 52% Paul (R), 44% Conway (D)

FL-Sen: 42% Rubio (R), 31% Crist (I), 18% Meek (D)

CO-Sen: 49% Bennet (D), 48% Buck (R)

CA-Sen: 49% Boxer (D), 45% Fiorina (R)

PA-Sen: 50% Toomey (R), 44% Sestak (D)

OH-Sen: 53% Portman (R), 40% Fisher (D)

NY-Sen (S): 57% Gillibrand (D), 33% DioGuardi (R)

NY-Sen (R): 59% Schumer (D), 35% Townsend (R)

...

CT-Gov: 48% Malloy (D), 44% Foley (R)

CO-Gov: 47% Hickenlooper (D), 40% Tancredo (C), 9% Maes (R)

CA-Gov: 50% Brown (D), 41% Whitman (R)

FL-Gov: 44% Sink (D), 41% Scott (R)

NY-Gov: 57% Cuomo (D), 27% Paladino (R)

OH-Gov: 48% Kasich (R), 45% Strickland (D)

PA-Gov: 50% Corbett (R), 41% Onorato (D)

IL-Gov: 47% Brady (R), 40% Quinn (D)

NV-Gov: 56% Sandoval (R), 40% R. Reid (D)

WI-Gov: 53% Walker (R), 43% Barrett (D)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/pollster/

[Landslide Lyndon]

The numbers look credible but aren't all internet polls pretty unreliable?

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

They do seem pretty on the mark for what I'm expecting...

[Keystone Phil]

I'll echo the other comments: they like very reasonable.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Yes, Giannoulias wins.

[RI]

The fact that every last one is just about where the 'consensus' is (except maybe IL-SEN) makes me a bit skeptical, on top of them being internet polls.

[Psychic Octopus]

The fact that every last one is just about where the 'consensus' is (except maybe IL-SEN) makes me a bit skeptical, on top of them being internet polls.

Pretty much. Most of these I have no trouble believing, but IL-Sen and having Bennet ahead seems sort of unlikely to me, considering he seems to be opening a bit of a lead again (Up 4 in the latest Rassy, and 4 in the latest Marist, a swing of two to him in the former). I don't know what to make of them, and I do not like internet polling.

Yes, Giannoulias wins.

Internet poll that contradicts the recent swing towards Kirk from Rasmussen and the Chicago Tribune. And note that when compared to other polls, this poll shows almost universal movement to Alexi. Not saying it isn't accurate, but it seems unlikely, and again, it is an internet poll.

[albaleman]

The fact that every last one is just about where the 'consensus' is (except maybe IL-SEN) makes me a bit skeptical, on top of them being internet polls.

Pretty much. Most of these I have no trouble believing, but IL-Sen and having Bennet ahead seems sort of unlikely to me, considering he seems to be opening a bit of a lead again (Up 4 in the latest Rassy, and 4 in the latest Marist, a swing of two to him in the former). I don't know what to make of them, and I do not like internet polling.

Yes, Giannoulias wins.

Internet poll that contradicts the recent swing towards Kirk from Rasmussen and the Chicago Tribune. And note that when compared to other polls, this poll shows almost universal movement to Alexi. Not saying it isn't accurate, but it seems unlikely, and again, it is an internet poll.

YouGov is a really bad pollster anyway.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

We will see anyways what PPP noit Rasmussen final poll has to say about, I bet they will have giannoulias ahead.

[Vepres]

IL-SEN and CO-SEN aren't consistent with other recent polls.

In other polls, Kirk has about a three point lead, and Buck seems to have rebounded from his gaffe a couple weeks ago by laying low.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

With early voting I going the Dems way I seriously doubt that a 3 pt lead is a comfortable lead anyone can win in IL and CO. And Obama stumped for Giannoulias and we may have a bump there as well.

[Keystone Phil]

And Obama stumped for Giannoulias

Awesome. So with 0% of precincts reporting, let's go ahead and call this one for Kirk.

[DrScholl]

Well, they've nailed just about everything where other pollsters have it. We'll have to see where PPP has Illinois and Colorado.