U.S. House Redistricting: Illinois
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 06:56:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  U.S. House Redistricting: Illinois
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
Author Topic: U.S. House Redistricting: Illinois  (Read 50214 times)
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #150 on: May 28, 2011, 04:42:25 PM »

Fantastic!
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #151 on: May 28, 2011, 05:37:29 PM »

I'm sure the residents of fast-growing exurban areas like New Lenox are going to love being represented by racist nutter Bobby Rush in IL-01.   They have little in common with the inner city Chicago ghetto that makes up about 55% of the district.  The city portion of IL-01 is 86% black.  The suburban and exurban parts of that district are 71% white.   The Will County exurban portion is only 2% black.  The district is about 53% black.

Given rates of exurban growth and black flight from Chicago, it might be possible that the district becomes majority suburban by the end of the decade.  That hasn't hurt Jesse Jackson Junior from getting reelected in IL-02, though - but the suburban areas in his district are more black than those in IL-01.

The district may become majority suburban, but the Democratic primary vote in the district would not. Similarly, the district could be 40% black and still have a majority of Democratic primary voters be black.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,309


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #152 on: May 28, 2011, 09:00:14 PM »

I don't think anyone's figured that out yet, since it requires a lot of number-crunching, rather than just drawing the map in DRA.

I ask because it's probably the more relevant figure.  Someone will figure it out, eventually.

Do you think those 60% Obama districts will become Bush districts? I don't think that would happen even in suburban Chicago.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,031
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #153 on: May 28, 2011, 09:16:31 PM »

I'm sure the residents of fast-growing exurban areas like New Lenox are going to love being represented by racist nutter Bobby Rush in IL-01.   They have little in common with the inner city Chicago ghetto that makes up about 55% of the district.  The city portion of IL-01 is 86% black.  The suburban and exurban parts of that district are 71% white.   The Will County exurban portion is only 2% black.  The district is about 53% black.

Given rates of exurban growth and black flight from Chicago, it might be possible that the district becomes majority suburban by the end of the decade.  That hasn't hurt Jesse Jackson Junior from getting reelected in IL-02, though - but the suburban areas in his district are more black than those in IL-01.

If they don't like it they can vote against him. We'll see how far that goes.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #154 on: May 28, 2011, 09:28:46 PM »

I don't think anyone's figured that out yet, since it requires a lot of number-crunching, rather than just drawing the map in DRA.

I ask because it's probably the more relevant figure.  Someone will figure it out, eventually.

Do you think those 60% Obama districts will become Bush districts? I don't think that would happen even in suburban Chicago.

I doubt it.  I just would like the numbers because, as I said, they are probably more relevant.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,146
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #155 on: May 28, 2011, 09:33:29 PM »

It's not exact, but for the suburban districts, I subtract 6-7% from Obama's total and that probably brings it down to where the numbers were in 2004. Of course, not all swing is uniform, but it can give you a slight idea.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #156 on: May 28, 2011, 09:47:11 PM »

I don't think anyone's figured that out yet, since it requires a lot of number-crunching, rather than just drawing the map in DRA.

I ask because it's probably the more relevant figure.  Someone will figure it out, eventually.

Do you think those 60% Obama districts will become Bush districts? I don't think that would happen even in suburban Chicago.

It would line up right. Lake County swung 11%, McHenry about 13%, and Dupage 10%.
Logged
timothyinMD
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 438


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #157 on: May 28, 2011, 10:03:12 PM »

Def the most disgraceful map yet.  Not a surprise
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,309


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #158 on: May 29, 2011, 01:51:40 AM »

Def the most disgraceful map yet.  Not a surprise

LOL seriously? And what Republicans do is perfectly fine, huh? Seriously this is like one Dem gerrymander that will happen this time around. The rest of the map's around the country are going to be Dem packs.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,309


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #159 on: May 29, 2011, 01:52:31 AM »

I don't think anyone's figured that out yet, since it requires a lot of number-crunching, rather than just drawing the map in DRA.

I ask because it's probably the more relevant figure.  Someone will figure it out, eventually.

Do you think those 60% Obama districts will become Bush districts? I don't think that would happen even in suburban Chicago.

It would line up right. Lake County swung 11%, McHenry about 13%, and Dupage 10%.

It's within the realm of possibility. Certainly would be interesting to look at the Bush numbers.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,031
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #160 on: May 29, 2011, 01:56:39 AM »

The current Dold seat is 60% Obama and it was like 52% Kerry.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,972


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #161 on: May 29, 2011, 06:59:51 AM »

People, don't take the bait this time--keep it to discussing Illinois. Thx
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #162 on: May 29, 2011, 07:17:34 AM »

Atkinson lives in Burr Ridge, which is right on the edge of the new IL-11. He now has to choose between running against Bill Foster (who just announced) or Dan Lipinski. Don Manzullo's going to have a bit of a headache on his hands, with Kinzinger and possibly Walsh running in IL-16.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #163 on: May 29, 2011, 12:35:51 PM »
« Edited: May 29, 2011, 02:07:20 PM by cinyc »

What are the Bush 2004 numbers in the respective districts?

That's not as easy to calculate as you think.  Illinois' cities and counties are responsible for running elections and reporting results, and their 2004 election reporting is far from uniform.  Some very important, highly Gerrymandered counties - Will (6 CDs) and Madison (3 CDs) - don't make township-level results available on their websites, let alone the precinct-level results that would be necessary to get accurate 2004 numbers given the very high level of Gerrymandering.  Even the Atlas doesn't have that data.  Short of calling up or visiting the relevant county officials to get the precinct canvass books (assuming they exist), it is not possible to get anything but an estimate.

And that's before having to track down any change in precinct boundaries from 2004 to 2010.
Logged
timothyinMD
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 438


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #164 on: May 29, 2011, 02:38:25 PM »

What I support is common sense redistricting that respects communities and are derived from natural boundaries.

The problem YOU LIBERALS have is that if that were to happen across the board, you all would be relegated to a minority of 70-90% Democrat seats, while we would have a majority with seats that were 50-70% Republican.  Sorry guys-- not our fault democrats are crowded into a small number of districts.

The Missouri map could have been a little tidier but the outcome would have been the same.
Indiana, Iowa, Nebraska, Oklahoma look good.  I hate Louisiana but we were forced to gerrymander it by an archaic racism statute
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #165 on: May 29, 2011, 02:42:42 PM »

The Missouri map could have been a little tidier but the outcome would have been the same.
...insofar that Carnahan would have been out of a job, or at least have to move. Of course, in any remotely cleanish map so would have been Hartzler (losing a primary to Luetkemeyer, with a new Republican from North Missouri) and  Akin (losing the general election to a Democrat, possibly Carnahan), but that's a minor trifle, right? Tongue
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #166 on: May 29, 2011, 02:46:03 PM »

What I support is common sense redistricting that respects communities and are derived from natural boundaries.

Like the proposed Michigan map? Roll Eyes
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #167 on: May 29, 2011, 04:35:27 PM »
« Edited: May 29, 2011, 04:42:12 PM by krazen1211 »

What I support is common sense redistricting that respects communities and are derived from natural boundaries.

The problem YOU LIBERALS have is that if that were to happen across the board, you all would be relegated to a minority of 70-90% Democrat seats, while we would have a majority with seats that were 50-70% Republican.  Sorry guys-- not our fault democrats are crowded into a small number of districts.

The Missouri map could have been a little tidier but the outcome would have been the same.
Indiana, Iowa, Nebraska, Oklahoma look good.  I hate Louisiana but we were forced to gerrymander it by an archaic racism statute

Yep. Didn't the Democrats take Will County and split it 6 ways?

Under common sense districting Detroit, minus the Hispanic part, would have been shoved into its own district. The law creates a pair of artificially ugly districts rather than 2 that maintain communities of interest.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #168 on: May 29, 2011, 06:34:44 PM »

A good, safe Dem gerrymander. This map should create some very interesting races, both in the primary and the general. The Dold race will be especially interesting to watch if he indeed runs for re-election.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #169 on: May 29, 2011, 11:42:51 PM »

Imagine if Bill Brady were governor, Dems could have been stuck with an incumbent protection map
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #170 on: May 30, 2011, 01:21:02 AM »

I'm sure the residents of fast-growing exurban areas like New Lenox are going to love being represented by racist nutter Bobby Rush in IL-01.   They have little in common with the inner city Chicago ghetto that makes up about 55% of the district.  The city portion of IL-01 is 86% black.  The suburban and exurban parts of that district are 71% white.   The Will County exurban portion is only 2% black.  The district is about 53% black.

Given rates of exurban growth and black flight from Chicago, it might be possible that the district becomes majority suburban by the end of the decade.  That hasn't hurt Jesse Jackson Junior from getting reelected in IL-02, though - but the suburban areas in his district are more black than those in IL-01.

The district may become majority suburban, but the Democratic primary vote in the district would not. Similarly, the district could be 40% black and still have a majority of Democratic primary voters be black.

Last I checked, Illinois' primaries are quasi-open.  Anyone can vote in them, but which primary you vote in goes on the record.  

If enough suburbanites understand that the only way to get rid of racist nutter Bobby Rush is in a Democratic primary, those who otherwise think of themselves as Republican or independent could theoretically vote against him in a Democratic primary if/when the IL-01 balance tips to the suburbs.  Likely?  Probably not - but one can dream of a former Black Panther getting kicked to the curb due to too-cute-by-half racial Gerrymandering gone wrong, can't they?
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #171 on: May 30, 2011, 01:30:08 AM »
« Edited: May 30, 2011, 01:32:27 AM by Lunar »

Cinyc -- wouldn't they have to forgo the rest of the Republican primary ballot though? I have a feeling far more voters would be interested in, say, the Republican presidential race primary (2012) or the Republican governor primary (2014) , than voting Democratic in some scheme Smiley
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,860
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #172 on: May 30, 2011, 01:52:39 AM »

Rush is a fossil of the 60's. But as far as I know he has the good sense to keep a low profile, unlike some other nutters (Steve King, Bachmann, Foxx).
Logged
ill ind
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #173 on: May 30, 2011, 08:10:25 AM »

  Well, since the GOP will have a presidential primary, and the Dems will not--and also because there are no statewide offices on the ballot in 2012, I don't see a whole lot of GOP primary voters crossing over and voting against Rush in the Dem primary.  If anything, Dems will cross over and vote in the GOP primary.
  I agree--even as an Illinoisan--with liberal tendancies--that Rush can be a total embarrassment.  However the way the district is drawn, there is more than enough of Chicago in there that I'd be suprised if he falls below 70% in a general election.

Ill_Ind
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,972


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #174 on: May 30, 2011, 08:46:25 AM »

I'm sure I dig hard enough I can find posts by Cinyc expressing outrage at the perhaps millions of African American Democrats in the South stranded in 60-65% McCain districts represented by Republicans who don't give a damn if their record and words alienate every single one of them.

Unless he thinks the white voters of Crete, Illinois are more important and worthy of concern, but that can't be true.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.061 seconds with 11 queries.