What is considered a 'Safe' popular vote win? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 08:05:01 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Process
  Polling (Moderator: muon2)
  What is considered a 'Safe' popular vote win? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What is considered a 'Safe' popular vote win?  (Read 16769 times)
The Vorlon
Vorlon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,660


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -4.21

« on: March 21, 2004, 02:01:15 AM »

That's Bill Schneider's take on it.  Greenfield says it's probably more like 2%.  So does Michael Beschloss.  Of course it's mathematically possible to win 70% of the PV and still lose.  But unlikely.

It's 83%. Smiley

Mathematickky you can win with 11 votes (1-0 in  the big 11 states ) and millions against you un all other states - 99.999%

Yes, but that's altering the number of voters. My example is based on turnout being the same which makes more sense.

Actually, turnout DOES vary a lot from state to state.

In 2000 Gore won New York by about 1.7 million votes, while Bush won Texas by about 1.3? million or so - making up most of Gore's margin in the PV, even though NY and Texas are about the same size (bush won texas by 21, Gore NY by 25)

Why the huge difference..?  In 2000 there was a very hot senate race in NY (Clinton vs Lazio) while the Texas race was a yawner..

Here is a scenario..  On election day the Eastern seaboard gets clobbered by a huge snowstorm while the South has a real nice day...

I bet that would skew the popular vote at least a few %...

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 14 queries.