US House Redistricting: Michigan
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 12:07:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  US House Redistricting: Michigan
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 18
Author Topic: US House Redistricting: Michigan  (Read 85076 times)
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #100 on: March 23, 2011, 10:02:13 AM »

I seriously doubt the legislation was sufficiently thought-through to account for such municipalities.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #101 on: March 23, 2011, 11:38:57 AM »

The Pointe that has a precinct in Macomb is Gross Pointe Shores.  It was two separate townships in 2000.  It incorporated as a city during the past decade.  Its population is relatively small, though - about 3,000.

Michigan has a few other cities that straddled county lines in 2000.  Are there special rules for cities that straddle county lines?  Can they be placed in either county, or do they need to be broken up?

In theory, when the 2 provisions conflict, I suppose I'd just pick the one that favors the GOP more.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #102 on: March 23, 2011, 01:04:27 PM »

I seriously doubt the legislation was sufficiently thought-through to account for such municipalities.

Well, there are a number of them, including the state capital of Lansing, which is mainly in Ingham but also part in Eaton County.  I know this in part because it screws up the labels on my forthcoming population change maps.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,076
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #103 on: March 23, 2011, 01:33:22 PM »
« Edited: March 23, 2011, 01:57:21 PM by Torie »

One of the Pointes has a precinct in Macomb County. Poor guys don't deserve to be stuck with the Detroit districts year after year; I hate the idea of letting good Pubbies drown.

The Pointe that has a precinct in Macomb is Gross Pointe Shores.  It was two separate townships in 2000.  It incorporated as a city during the past decade.  Its population is relatively small, though - about 3,000.

Michigan has a few other cities that straddled county lines in 2000.  Are there special rules for cities that straddle county lines?  Can they be placed in either county, or do they need to be broken up?

No, they can be placed in either county.  The money quote from the statute is this: "Congressional district lines shall break as few city and township boundaries as is reasonably possible."  Notice that the splitting of municipalities and counties are given equal weight from counting demerit points as it were. So, one get one point as I see it for either splitting a city or a county, and if you have to do one or the other, you can pick, and of course since the split is necessitated one way or the other, the split by definition is "reasonable." Reasonableness is the benchmark here; it is not a bright line test, so one can argue away that your additional splits are "reasonable." The court might buy it - or not.

An interesting thought occurred to me as a legal argument for me dipping MI-12 into Wayne County to pick up the Pointes. It is a nose in the tent argument. Since for that one town that is bifurcated (by one precinct) between Macomb and Wayne, you get to pick which split you want to do. You pick to cross into Wayne to avoid the municipality split. And since you are now in Wayne anyway, you're in baby, and now free to suck up the rest of the Pointes precincts. It is just another arrow in the quiver. Another is to whine that the Flint area is split enough, and to do anymore will prove inconvenient for this reason or that, and so to avoid it, the dip into the Pointes by MI-12 crossing a county boundary is well - "reasonable!"  Smiley
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,076
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #104 on: March 23, 2011, 01:42:47 PM »

I'm thinking 1 district for Macomb Democrats, 1 district for Oakland Democrats, 1 district for Ann Arbor, 1 district for Detroit, and 1 district for everything else in Wayne County that McCotter doesn't want.

Where does the Ann Arbor district go after it fills up on Washtenaw? It would need nearly 400,000 other people. That, coincidentally, is the population left over in Wayne County after you allocate it two districts.

On edit: Wayne + Washtenaw = 2,165,000. 
Three districts = about 2,130,000.

The Pubbies are protected by the Voting Rights Act. One can't draw two 50% VAP black CD's that way. The VRA is a wonderful thing for Pubbies, except sometimes in the case of Hispanic CD's, when it is not so good. But for blacks, it's wonderful!  Smiley

I think the question has become whether two VRA districts can be drawn in the first place. It might be possible but it will be rather tough.

It can be done - easily. In my map, one black CD is 63.5% black, and the other 52.1% black.  That is for non final population numbers. The final VAP census numbers may push MI-13 down below 50% black VAP, but if so, the precincts between MI-14 and MI-13 can easily be jiggled to get MI-13 above the 50% black VAP threshold, even if it necessitates a municipality split that would otherwise be illegal under Michigan state law.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #105 on: March 23, 2011, 01:49:38 PM »

I don't see how they justify two Detroit districts. And if you go down to one Detroit district, then Ann Arbor is no longer in with Dingell, and you have a lot of Democrats in Macomb and Oakland who don't really fit into a single district. I am curious what happens.

I'm thinking 1 district for Macomb Democrats, 1 district for Oakland Democrats, 1 district for Ann Arbor, 1 district for Detroit, and 1 district for everything else in Wayne County that McCotter doesn't want.


That Detroit district might displace NY-16 as the new Mordor.
Mordor has a lot of surface. I think you mean the new Rivendell. Tongue

Torie, your map's two districts have probably no more than half a million inhabitants each. Sorry to break it, but all your work here is only good for the trash can now. Detroit is gone. Party's over. The city is no more.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,076
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #106 on: March 23, 2011, 02:01:21 PM »

I don't see how they justify two Detroit districts. And if you go down to one Detroit district, then Ann Arbor is no longer in with Dingell, and you have a lot of Democrats in Macomb and Oakland who don't really fit into a single district. I am curious what happens.

I'm thinking 1 district for Macomb Democrats, 1 district for Oakland Democrats, 1 district for Ann Arbor, 1 district for Detroit, and 1 district for everything else in Wayne County that McCotter doesn't want.


That Detroit district might displace NY-16 as the new Mordor.
Mordor has a lot of surface. I think you mean the new Rivendell. Tongue

Torie, your map's two districts have probably no more than half a million inhabitants each. Sorry to break it, but all your work here is only good for the trash can now. Detroit is gone. Party's over. The city is no more.

Wait a minute. I thought the county numbers were accurate; it was only the intra county numbers that were subject to adjustment. If so, it would be near impossible to have that much of an error factor. Or am I missing something?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #107 on: March 23, 2011, 02:12:01 PM »
« Edited: March 23, 2011, 02:16:08 PM by new, improved Lewis Trondheim »

I was slightly exaggerating, but Wayne County as a whole has 130,000 people fewer than your map supposes.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #108 on: March 23, 2011, 03:18:38 PM »

I don't see how they justify two Detroit districts. And if you go down to one Detroit district, then Ann Arbor is no longer in with Dingell, and you have a lot of Democrats in Macomb and Oakland who don't really fit into a single district. I am curious what happens.

I'm thinking 1 district for Macomb Democrats, 1 district for Oakland Democrats, 1 district for Ann Arbor, 1 district for Detroit, and 1 district for everything else in Wayne County that McCotter doesn't want.


That Detroit district might displace NY-16 as the new Mordor.
Mordor has a lot of surface. I think you mean the new Rivendell. Tongue

Torie, your map's two districts have probably no more than half a million inhabitants each. Sorry to break it, but all your work here is only good for the trash can now. Detroit is gone. Party's over. The city is no more.

Wait a minute. I thought the county numbers were accurate; it was only the intra county numbers that were subject to adjustment. If so, it would be near impossible to have that much of an error factor. Or am I missing something?

No. The estimates were still estimates; they were not actual Census numbers. And apparently the 2009 estimates way, way overestimated Detroit (or, rather, underestimated its decline). Detroit as a whole has almost 200,000 fewer people than your map presupposed. There was huge error.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,076
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #109 on: March 23, 2011, 03:21:21 PM »

I was slightly exaggerating, but Wayne County as a whole has 130,000 people fewer than your map supposes.

How many people does Wayne have? Mine has 1,977,977.
Logged
Nhoj
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,224
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.52, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #110 on: March 23, 2011, 03:23:56 PM »

I was slightly exaggerating, but Wayne County as a whole has 130,000 people fewer than your map supposes.

How many people does Wayne have? Mine has 1,977,977.
1,820,584
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,955


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #111 on: March 23, 2011, 03:34:38 PM »

I was slightly exaggerating, but Wayne County as a whole has 130,000 people fewer than your map supposes.

How many people does Wayne have? Mine has 1,977,977.
1,820,584

It looks to me that all the Pubbies being counted on to keep McCotter's career on life support are 300 miles further west than expected.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,076
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #112 on: March 23, 2011, 03:42:45 PM »

I was slightly exaggerating, but Wayne County as a whole has 130,000 people fewer than your map supposes.

How many people does Wayne have? Mine has 1,977,977.
1,820,584

Wow, just wow. Does anyone know the population of Macomb? I will calculate what I have. If it dropped enough, the dip into the Pointes will be airtight legally. Thanks.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #113 on: March 23, 2011, 03:45:39 PM »

Macomb actually grew. It's around 802,000 people IIRC (don't recall the exact numbers).
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,076
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #114 on: March 23, 2011, 03:48:21 PM »
« Edited: March 23, 2011, 03:59:24 PM by Torie »

Macomb actually grew. It's around 802,000 people IIRC (don't recall the exact numbers).

My number is 827,770. Oh, I found the data link to all of this, here.  Macomb is 840,978, actually a tad above my number. But the population drop in Wayne, will just suck up a bunch more Dem precincts, and the Pubbies may be totally unleashed if they can draw two black VAP 50% CD's, but need to go where convenient to do it, like into Washtenaw or the SW corner of Macomb, or whatever. And excising the Pointes may be "necessary" as well. It could give the Pubbies quite a hunting license, and quite possibly shove MI-12 out of the marginal zone, in which event it will be Pubbies +1 point, rather than just +.5 points.

Pity Ohio is taking so long. I would like to get it done by the time the Dave Bradlee software gets the census numbers in its data base for Michigan. I can't wait!
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,955


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #115 on: March 23, 2011, 04:01:09 PM »

the Pubbies may be totally unleashed if they can draw two black VAP 50% CD's, but need to go where convenient to do it, like into Washtenaw or the SW corner of Macomb, or whatever.

Washtenaw is about 12% African American according to the discredited 2009 data (40,000 African-Americans) and McCotter's district lies between there and Detroit. It may well be that the future is as you imagine it, a Republican boot stamping on a Democratic face forever, but it's conceivable that not as many teeth will get knocked out. We shall see.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #116 on: March 23, 2011, 04:15:36 PM »

the Pubbies may be totally unleashed if they can draw two black VAP 50% CD's, but need to go where convenient to do it, like into Washtenaw or the SW corner of Macomb, or whatever.

Washtenaw is about 12% African American according to the discredited 2009 data (40,000 African-Americans) and McCotter's district lies between there and Detroit. It may well be that the future is as you imagine it, a Republican boot stamping on a Democratic face forever, but it's conceivable that not as many teeth will get knocked out. We shall see.

Eh - that estimate was actually accurate, for once.   Washtenaw is 12.5% non-Hispanic black with approximately 43,000 African Americans.  That's barely up from 12.2% non-Hispanic black in 2000 with about 39,000 African Americans.  The black population fell by about 12.6% in Ann Arbor.  It rose in the surrounding townships.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #117 on: March 23, 2011, 04:50:18 PM »
« Edited: March 23, 2011, 04:54:58 PM by krazen1211 »

Trivia question: What is the size of the largest precinct in Detroit that gave McCain 0 votes?

For the record, Obama got 325,534 votes in Detroit City. McCain got 8,888.


That analogy actually works well. The elves after all were fleeing Rivendell. Smiley

If I were the Michigan GOP I would just change the law to allow more county splits in and adjacent to Wayne County. You need it to protect Detroit's black districts anyway.
Logged
Capitan Zapp Brannigan
Addicted to Politics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #118 on: March 23, 2011, 04:52:27 PM »

Where would the Democrats Valinor be? California?
Logged
Linus Van Pelt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,144


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #119 on: March 27, 2011, 12:08:11 PM »

Two black majority VAP districts remain possible even without any weird snakes or an extra cross into Macomb, so the Detroit pack is clearly VRA-incompatible. But you have to go much further afield than we have been expecting. I'm not sure what the GOP will decide to do about this. Two examples, without having calculated all the ramifications to the surrounding districts: first, you can now go way downriver and totally overwhelm Dingell's core territory if you want; the second uses the brown district to attack the Oakland Dems more. (I've just moved the brown northward on the second map, but if the unneeded Macomb crossover is allowed by the law, which I'm not sure about, then in the second map the blue might as well also go north instead of south given that you're leaving Dingell his district.)





Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #120 on: March 27, 2011, 12:11:28 PM »

Would it be possible to do an extension into Macomb? Macomb has to be split regardless; it's too big for one seat.
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #121 on: March 27, 2011, 01:45:10 PM »

Would it be possible to do an extension into Macomb? Macomb has to be split regardless; it's too big for one seat.



The two Wayne County districts here are both ~53% black.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,307


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #122 on: March 27, 2011, 04:01:08 PM »
« Edited: March 27, 2011, 04:07:13 PM by sbane »

Would it be possible to do an extension into Macomb? Macomb has to be split regardless; it's too big for one seat.

The other option is to use southern Macomb for another Dem district and add it to the non-black lean Dem areas of Oakland county and combine the 9th and the 12th that way. The second map that linus posted is what I think is likely. It still frees up territory in south Wayne for Dingell that no pubbie probably wants as well as eliminates a Dem district without any consequences.

Although I guess it also depends on whether a whole district will be forced within Macomb. But if they didn't do it in 2000, they probably won't do it now.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #123 on: March 27, 2011, 05:15:54 PM »
« Edited: March 27, 2011, 05:17:32 PM by Verily »

You could do a whole district in Macomb regardless, although the lack of one in 2000 does indicate that they won't bother this time, either. If they do try to leave a whole seat in Macomb, it would contain everything but Eastpointe, Center Line and most of Warren, which either go in a Detroit CD or in a Macomb-Oakland Dem CD.

Strictly speaking, there's no need for a black district to cross into either Macomb or Oakland counties; I managed two districts barely over 50% black VAP in Wayne County alone.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,076
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #124 on: March 27, 2011, 08:21:53 PM »

Would it be possible to do an extension into Macomb? Macomb has to be split regardless; it's too big for one seat.



The two Wayne County districts here are both ~53% black.

Oh God, I am getting an orgasm over that map. Perfecto! That is just what I wanted to see. Tongue
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 18  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 11 queries.