US House Redistricting: Michigan (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 02:53:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  US House Redistricting: Michigan (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: US House Redistricting: Michigan  (Read 85011 times)
timothyinMD
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 438


« on: May 29, 2011, 02:26:30 PM »

The leaked republican map looks very good.  That's how I think we should do redistricting-- avoid overreaching.  If they wanted to I bet they could have drawn a 10-4 map.

The comments by the Democrat in that article are paper thin.  Who gives a #### if Obama got 57% in Michigan.  9 Republicans were duly elected in that 57% Obama state.  The Dem areas are the areas losing population. It's just that they take the loss.  

9R 5D Michigan is a success
Logged
timothyinMD
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 438


« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2011, 12:43:50 PM »

I'd like to see krazen or BigSkyBob draw a map as to what they'd consider "fair", but they'll probably just argue that the current disgusting GOP gerrymander is a fair map.

A fair map would give the Democrats 6 districts; 1 in Flint/Saginaw, 1 in Detroit, 1 in Lower Oakland/Macomb, 1 in Wayne County, 1 in Washentaw/remainder of Wayne, and perhaps 1 in central Oakland. There is no other compelling strength of Democratic votes to guarantee them a 7th seat unless you decide to exclude extremely rational choices like attacking Ingram to neighboring Livingston County as was done in Debbie Stabenow's district.

The proposed maps include curious choices to needlessly reconfigure compact districts like the 6th that nicely sit in a corner of the state. Which are of course valid choices that adhere to municipal boundaries, but do not preclude the idea of other valid choices.


so a state that hasn't voted republican since 1988 is entitled to only six democratic seats? What are you smoking?

No one is entitled to anything, except what you earn by winning elections.   NORTH DAKOTA hasn't voted Democrat since 1964 yet it had an all Democrat congressional delegation for 24 years?  Was that "unfair?"   No
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.