US House Redistricting: Indiana
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 04:26:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  US House Redistricting: Indiana
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6
Author Topic: US House Redistricting: Indiana  (Read 27936 times)
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #100 on: April 12, 2011, 04:13:53 PM »

The proposed map in question would put him in the seventh. So he would have to face Carson if this ends up ad the final map.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,313
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #101 on: April 12, 2011, 04:29:57 PM »

The proposed map in question would put him in the seventh. So he would have to face Carson if this ends up ad the final map.

Or he could just, you know, move to the district where he has the best chance of winning.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,824
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #102 on: April 12, 2011, 05:16:39 PM »

This map is to conciliatory to the Dems. Though it does put Indy in play for the GOP.

No it doesn't.

It would put Rokita in a race against Carson.
Tea Party for the flip IN-7

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7edeOEuXdMU
Logged
Horus
Sheliak5
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,751
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #103 on: April 12, 2011, 05:57:54 PM »
« Edited: April 12, 2011, 06:04:16 PM by Sheliak5 »

This map is to conciliatory to the Dems. Though it does put Indy in play for the GOP.

Far from it. Indy is trending Dem, and the city is getting a bit less white at that. This map might shift Carson's district a point and a half to the GOP, at most.

EDIT:

Rokita will be in Burton's district, not Carson's. IN-7 is Safe Dem.

http://www.wishtv.com/dpp/news/politics/new-plan-puts-rokita-in-burtons-area
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #104 on: April 13, 2011, 12:17:42 PM »

If that's the case then the GOP might've shot themselves in the foot. Not good
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,832
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #105 on: April 13, 2011, 06:33:43 PM »

obviously this map has a like 5% chance of passing. But I wanted to show my fantasy map just for kicks. One may think its a democratic gerrymander but under this map A: republicans have five safe seats and B)the districts are fairly contiguous


Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,828
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #106 on: April 20, 2011, 12:13:19 AM »

Very nice.  They slice up Laporte,  Put Bloomington between the Indy and Louisville suburbs, and split southern Indiana between 3 districts.  They also put 4 districts around Marion County.


And here's what the Republicans have proposed:


Logged
timothyinMD
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 438


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #107 on: April 20, 2011, 08:37:25 PM »

This is a very clean map that accurately reflects Indiana.

When calling some of these seats "marginal" by using 2008 Pres numbers, you're all forgetting something:  2012 Obama isn't going to come anywhere close to the 49% he got in Indiana last time.

Those 7 seats are in the bag for Repubs
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,532
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #108 on: April 20, 2011, 09:12:49 PM »

This is a very clean map that accurately reflects Indiana.

When calling some of these seats "marginal" by using 2008 Pres numbers, you're all forgetting something:  2012 Obama isn't going to come anywhere close to the 49% he got in Indiana last time.

Those 7 seats are in the bag for Repubs

I think its hard to judge Indiana based on any recent presidential results including those from 2004 and 2000.  Obama was the first Democrat to make an honest effort there in a while but the McCain campaign was also caught off guard by an all-out offensive in a state that had voted reliably for Republicans in the previous 10 presidential elections.  I think it is definitely possible that Obama wins in Indiana again, especially if he increases his share of the national popular vote.  He's not just going to roll over and hand the state to the Republicans even though that sometimes appears to be his governing "strategy."
Logged
timothyinMD
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 438


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #109 on: April 20, 2011, 09:29:33 PM »

This is a very clean map that accurately reflects Indiana.

When calling some of these seats "marginal" by using 2008 Pres numbers, you're all forgetting something:  2012 Obama isn't going to come anywhere close to the 49% he got in Indiana last time.

Those 7 seats are in the bag for Repubs

I think its hard to judge Indiana based on any recent presidential results including those from 2004 and 2000.  Obama was the first Democrat to make an honest effort there in a while but the McCain campaign was also caught off guard by an all-out offensive in a state that had voted reliably for Republicans in the previous 10 presidential elections.  I think it is definitely possible that Obama wins in Indiana again, especially if he increases his share of the national popular vote.  He's not just going to roll over and hand the state to the Republicans even though that sometimes appears to be his governing "strategy."

Considering you're a Democrat, I can see why you're optimistic about it, but don't bet on it.

Obama wont increase his nat'l popular vote, and he's going to get trounced in Indiana. 
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,132
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #110 on: April 20, 2011, 10:36:06 PM »

Rather Indiana in 2008 was a fluke or not will remain to be seen, we just don't know what those numbers are going to look like. I'd say it leans GOP in 2012, but just how much is the problem.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,776


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #111 on: April 21, 2011, 01:29:30 PM »

Regardless of whether Obama wins Indiana or not, local Democrats tend to outperform national Democrats in various parts of the state on a consistent basis. Using national data as a baseline for Congressional races tends to be fairly unrepresentative.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #112 on: April 23, 2011, 09:53:41 AM »

We will be taking back our regular spot as the first state to declare for the GOP.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,824
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #113 on: April 23, 2011, 12:01:00 PM »

We will be taking back our regular spot as the first state to declare for the GOP.

No you won't. Kentucky will be.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #114 on: April 30, 2011, 08:44:39 PM »

The GOP kinda screwed up on the map here. They should have at least put South Bend in the 1st. The map would have still looked pretty neat and it would have probably made IN-02 several points more Republican.
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #115 on: April 30, 2011, 09:20:04 PM »

The GOP kinda screwed up on the map here. They should have at least put South Bend in the 1st. The map would have still looked pretty neat and it would have probably made IN-02 several points more Republican.

Well, there's plenty of other things they could have done to get a safe 7-2 map as well, but since they didn't I'm kind of assuming they just decided to go with a least-county-splits map.  I mean, they even drew an incumbent into a Heavily D district in Indianapolis, along with a bunch of Republicans in South indy
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #116 on: April 30, 2011, 09:29:01 PM »
« Edited: April 30, 2011, 09:36:08 PM by Brown 2010! »

The GOP kinda screwed up on the map here. They should have at least put South Bend in the 1st. The map would have still looked pretty neat and it would have probably made IN-02 several points more Republican.

Well, there's plenty of other things they could have done to get a safe 7-2 map as well, but since they didn't I'm kind of assuming they just decided to go with a least-county-splits map.  I mean, they even drew an incumbent into a Heavily D district in Indianapolis, along with a bunch of Republicans in South indy

I saw a map on Red Racing Horses which also had very few county splits but was a much more efficient gerrymander by putting South Bend in the 1st and putting some Republican parts of southern Lake County into the 2nd. As for the 7th, they screwed up a little as well, but their screwup wasn't that bad (percentage-wise) in comparison to the 1st/2nd. The 1st could have been way more packed with Democrats.

http://www.redracinghorses.com/diary/306/indiana-hybrid-redistricting-maps
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #117 on: April 30, 2011, 10:54:31 PM »

The GOP kinda screwed up on the map here. They should have at least put South Bend in the 1st. The map would have still looked pretty neat and it would have probably made IN-02 several points more Republican.

Putting both Jackie and Silent Joe into the first is a royal no-no. Because that's what you would do if you put South Ben in the 1st
Also putting Rokita in the 7th and splitting Kokomo aren't things many republicans I know like all that well, but it could lead to an intresting GOP 4th district primary. It looks like I would be moved to that 4th district.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #118 on: May 01, 2011, 11:06:20 PM »

The GOP kinda screwed up on the map here. They should have at least put South Bend in the 1st. The map would have still looked pretty neat and it would have probably made IN-02 several points more Republican.

Putting both Jackie and Silent Joe into the first is a royal no-no. Because that's what you would do if you put South Ben in the 1st
Also putting Rokita in the 7th and splitting Kokomo aren't things many republicans I know like all that well, but it could lead to an intresting GOP 4th district primary. It looks like I would be moved to that 4th district.

Jackie Walorski can always move. Or they could have just put her house in the 2nd and the rest of South Bend into the 1st. Rokita won't run in the 7th, since it's way too Democratic for him.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #119 on: May 15, 2011, 08:35:26 AM »

The numbers from DKE:

IN-01 - 63.3 Obama, 35.8 McCain
IN-02 - 49.6 Obama, 49.3 McCain
IN-03 - 56.0 McCain, 43.0 Obama
IN-04 - 54.2 McCain, 44.6 Obama
IN-05 - 52.6 McCain, 46.6 Obama
IN-06 - 55.0 McCain, 43.6 Obama
IN-07 - 66.3 Obama, 32.8 McCain
IN-08 - 50.6 McCain, 48.1 Obama
IN-09 - 52.7 McCain, 46.2 Obama

IN-05 is made quite a bit more Democratic (it was 59-40 McCain); I guess they're expecting Dan Burton to get knocked out in the primary next year, since he's so disliked, he could make that seat competitive. And I'm still surprised they didn't do anything to IN-08, since it actually moved a hair to the Democrats.
Logged
JacobNC
psychicpanda
Rookie
**
Posts: 175
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #120 on: May 15, 2011, 08:59:03 AM »

Why would Indiana Republicans do something like that?  Are they stupid, like the Arkansas Democrats?  Joe Donnely, Baron Hill or Brad Ellsworth or some other moderate Democrat could easily win in at least three of those districts.
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #121 on: May 15, 2011, 10:19:25 AM »

Why would Indiana Republicans do something like that?  Are they stupid, like the Arkansas Democrats?  Joe Donnely, Baron Hill or Brad Ellsworth or some other moderate Democrat could easily win in at least three of those districts.

Well, the do have to try to create a 7-2 Gerrymander in a state Obama won by about a point, so their margins have to be pretty thin.
Logged
dpmapper
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 442
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #122 on: May 15, 2011, 11:46:51 AM »

Don't forget that Indiana had a 11-point swing towards the Dems from 2004 to 2008; the Obama numbers are a high-water mark for them.  All 7 districts Bush won with probably at least 60%. 
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #123 on: May 15, 2011, 01:30:44 PM »

Certainly not the Southeastern one... area didn't actually swing all that much.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #124 on: June 17, 2011, 08:03:52 PM »

For fun, here's a Dem gerrymander:



Blue - 59-40 Obama
Green - 56-43 Obama
Purple - 62-37 McCain
Red - 55-44 Obama
Yellow - 59-39 McCain
Teal - 58-41 McCain
Grey - 68-31 Obama
Light Purple - 53-46 Obama
Sky Blue - 57-41 McCain
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 12 queries.