Official US 2010 Census Results
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 01:54:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Official US 2010 Census Results
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 26
Author Topic: Official US 2010 Census Results  (Read 227654 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #75 on: December 21, 2010, 11:39:10 AM »

Not that surprising to me.  By my estimated population numbers I had the LAST FIVE seats going as follows:
Arizona           10th    +2
New York        28th   -1
Washington    10th  +1
Texas              36th  +4
Missouri          9th  

The NEXT FIVE were as such:

California           53rd
Florida               27th +2
Minnesota         8th
North Carolina   14th +1
Oregon              6th +1


So three "errors" (AZ, NY, MO vs CA, FL, MN) but all in the top five, or is anything else wrong? Still makes Arizona the most surprising.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,061
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #76 on: December 21, 2010, 11:40:47 AM »

So Ohio lost 1 or 2 ? Huh
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,940


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #77 on: December 21, 2010, 11:43:02 AM »

OHIO LOST 2
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,061
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #78 on: December 21, 2010, 11:44:13 AM »

OK, does anyone have the exact figures ?
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #79 on: December 21, 2010, 11:44:47 AM »

So three "errors" (AZ, NY, MO vs CA, FL, MN) but all in the top five, or is anything else wrong? Still makes Arizona the most surprising.

It depends on a lot of factors, like how much population movement there was in the past year, how much of it was unexpected, and so forth.  Also, my numbers were based solely on estimates, whereas the final results are an actual headcount (or as close to a headcount as we can come).

The estimates for Arizona and New York were obviously high.

Once I have solid numbers, I will let you know how many people each state needed for its next seat.  Between those last few seats, it will be really close.  A few thousand people, or maybe even under a thousand.

In 2000, UT was only a few hundred people away from getting the last seat, which went to NC instead.
Logged
Devilman88
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,498


Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #80 on: December 21, 2010, 11:45:30 AM »

Go on there website its there
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #81 on: December 21, 2010, 11:45:46 AM »

Check out the data: http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #82 on: December 21, 2010, 11:46:21 AM »


Illinois had a BETTER chance of keeping ALL its seats than Ohio had of losing only one.  My numbers had them getting seat #442 to go -1.
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #83 on: December 21, 2010, 11:47:56 AM »


Brutal!

Gotta get lunch, then I'll try to get some apportionment order and other info for y'all.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,940


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #84 on: December 21, 2010, 11:49:15 AM »


Brutal!

Gotta get lunch, then I'll try to get some apportionment order and other info for y'all.

Are you seeing 2010 data there? It still looks like it hasn't been loaded.
Logged
Devilman88
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,498


Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #85 on: December 21, 2010, 11:49:37 AM »

North Carolina grew faster then GA, that is shocking
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #86 on: December 21, 2010, 11:50:10 AM »


Brutal!

Gotta get lunch, then I'll try to get some apportionment order and other info for y'all.

Are you seeing 2010 data there? It still looks like it hasn't been loaded.

Click any of the "View as html" links.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #87 on: December 21, 2010, 11:50:28 AM »

EV totals (when someone gets makes a pretty map).  House reps = -2, except for DC

AK 3
AL 9
AR 6
AZ 11 (+1)
CA 55
CO 9
CT 7
DC 3
DE 3
FL 29 (+2)
GA 16 (+1)
HI 4
IA 6 (-1)
ID 4
IL 20 (-1)
IN 11
KS 6
KY 8
LA 8 (-1)
MA 11 (-1)
MD 10
ME 4
MI 16 (-1)
MN 10
MO 10 (-1)
MS 6
MT 3
NC 15
ND 3
NE 5
NH 4
NJ 14 (-1)
NM 5
NV 6 (+1)
NY 29 (-2)
OH 18 (-2)
OK 7
OR 7
PA 20 (-1)
RI 4
SC 9 (+1)
SD 3
TN 11
TX 38 (+4)
UT 6 (+1)
VA 13
VT 3
WA 12 (+1)
WI 10
WV 5
WY 3
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,061
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #88 on: December 21, 2010, 11:50:40 AM »


Still not updated.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #89 on: December 21, 2010, 11:52:40 AM »

http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/apportionment-pop-text.php
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #90 on: December 21, 2010, 11:53:18 AM »

http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/apportionment-data-text.php
Logged
Devilman88
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,498


Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #91 on: December 21, 2010, 11:53:29 AM »

North Carolina was the next in line to gain seat
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,940


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #92 on: December 21, 2010, 11:54:59 AM »

Whoa, Mass. still has more people than Arizona. I think AZ had passed Mass. or come close to it in estimates recently.
Logged
Devilman88
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,498


Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #93 on: December 21, 2010, 12:00:12 PM »

North Carolina was the 6th fasting growing state.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,061
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #94 on: December 21, 2010, 12:00:38 PM »

So that's :
- TX +4
- FL +2
- AZ, GA, NV, SC, UT, WA +1
- IA, IL, LA, MA, MI, MO, NJ, PA -1
- NY, OH -2
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #95 on: December 21, 2010, 12:00:53 PM »


Brutal!

Gotta get lunch, then I'll try to get some apportionment order and other info for y'all.

Are you seeing 2010 data there? It still looks like it hasn't been loaded.

Just click on the links under "view as HTML" or "download as CSV".  All the data is there.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,061
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #96 on: December 21, 2010, 12:02:28 PM »
« Edited: December 21, 2010, 12:04:48 PM by Antonio V »

Surprises are :
- Texas (should have gained 3)
- Florida (should have gained 1)
- Arizona (should have gained 2)
- Minnesota (should have lost 1)
- New York (should have lost 1)
- Missouri (should have stayed the same)
Logged
Storebought
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #97 on: December 21, 2010, 12:05:44 PM »

Pennsylvania has lost seats in every reapportionment.
Logged
Devilman88
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,498


Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #98 on: December 21, 2010, 12:28:30 PM »



This is the new map
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #99 on: December 21, 2010, 12:41:40 PM »

LAST TEN SEATS:
Seat #426: Texas 35 (+3)              Priority: 728,933
Seat #427: Pennsylvania 18 (-1)   Priority: 726,147
Seat #428: California 52 (-1)         Priority: 723,412
Seat #429: Georgia 14 (+1)           Priority: 718,097
Seat #430: South Carolina 7 (+1)  Priority: 713,709
Seat #431: California 53 (nc)         Priority: 709,631
Seat #432: Florida 27 (+2)            Priority: 709,610
Seat #433: Washington 10 (+1)   Priority: 708,829
Seat #434: Minnesota 8 (nc)         Priority: 708,767
Seat #435: Texas 36 (+4)             Priority: 708,396

NEXT TEN SEATS
Seat #436: North Carolina 14 (+1)  Priority: 706,817
Seat #437: Missouri 9 (nc)               Priority: 705,802
Seat #438: New York 28 (-1)           Priority: 704,775
Seat #439: New Jersey 13 (nc)       Priority: 703,915
Seat #440: Montana 2 (+1)             Priority: 699,622
Seat #441: Louisiana 7 (nc)            Priority: 699,514
Seat #442: Ohio 17 (-1)                  Priority: 699,503
Seat #443: Oregon 6 (+1)              Priority: 699,455
Seat #444: Virginia 12 (+1)            Priority: 696,400
Seat #445: California 54 (+1)         Priority: 696,366
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 26  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 12 queries.