Official US 2010 Census Results (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 12:51:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Official US 2010 Census Results (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Official US 2010 Census Results  (Read 228470 times)
danny
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,767
Israel


« on: December 09, 2010, 02:49:02 PM »

Well, I think now it should be high time to get the apportionment figures.

not long now, but they still have until the end of the month.
Logged
danny
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,767
Israel


« Reply #1 on: December 25, 2010, 01:49:55 AM »

Where can I find a document with the official population numbers ? I didn't find it on the census website.

On this page:

 http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/apportionment/apport.html
Logged
danny
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,767
Israel


« Reply #2 on: February 03, 2011, 07:22:58 PM »


The numbers for the first 4 states are out, but, of course they released the data in some horrible format I couldn't figure out how to use, so I'm looking here: http://twitter.com/Redistrict for important news. Some interesting stuff so far.
Logged
danny
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,767
Israel


« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2011, 06:03:55 AM »


The numbers for the first 4 states are out, but, of course they released the data in some horrible format I couldn't figure out how to use, so I'm looking here: http://twitter.com/Redistrict for important news. Some interesting stuff so far.

2010 Census News

If you click on a news release for a state, it includes links to thematic maps for population and population change per county, and an Excel file with some highlight data, including top 20 counties and cities.

Thanks, I was stuck with those FTP's.

Lakewood really sticks out, all the other 20 biggest cities and townships grow between -8% to +8% while Lakewood grew 53.8%.
Logged
danny
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,767
Israel


« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2011, 12:23:22 PM »

Speaking of Lakewood, the census Bureau did a horrible job of estimating it. It had its population growth from 60k in 2000 to 71k in 2009, and now the the census numbers a year later show 92k.
Logged
danny
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,767
Israel


« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2011, 05:31:24 PM »

Maps of New Jersey:
 http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/02/04/nyregion/20100204-jersey.html?ref=nyregion
Logged
danny
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,767
Israel


« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2011, 05:46:27 PM »

Did Oklahoma gain or lose population?

It gained, but at a slower rate than the country as a whole.
Logged
danny
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,767
Israel


« Reply #7 on: February 06, 2011, 07:52:56 AM »

Walpack township, New Jersey...

1970   384      54.8%
1980   150      −60.9%
1990   67      −55.3%
2000   41      −38.8%
Est. 2006   40      −2.4%
2010         16

Okay, this requires an explanation. The wiki article doesn't even begin to give one. It grew until 1970. Mining?
Meanwhile, some magazine named it the 18th best place to live in NJ in 2008. Seems the residents don't agree. Azn

Not mining, It looks like It's the Army Corps of Engineers fault. They wanted to turn the place into a lake so they forced a bunch of people out and afterwards abandoned the project was critical of how they kicked people out of their homes.
Logged
danny
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,767
Israel


« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2011, 10:32:43 AM »

Well I don't know about that site but the dam story is legit.
Logged
danny
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,767
Israel


« Reply #9 on: February 09, 2011, 01:26:30 PM »
« Edited: February 09, 2011, 01:28:21 PM by danny »

Data for Maryland is out, Baltimore city shrank while all the counties grew.
Logged
danny
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,767
Israel


« Reply #10 on: February 16, 2011, 02:52:45 PM »

You can see how in Chicago the population changed in this map.
Basically central Chicago grew while most of the rest lost population.
Logged
danny
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,767
Israel


« Reply #11 on: February 17, 2011, 03:31:40 PM »

Non Hispanic whites went from 52.4% to 45.3% while Hispanics went from 32% to 37.6%, if these trends continue then by the next census Texas will be Hispanic plurality.
Logged
danny
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,767
Israel


« Reply #12 on: March 02, 2011, 08:45:10 PM »

Why are they taking so effing long to ship South Carolina?  I can understand why they didn't give us the earliest priority, but I would have thought that they would have wanted to give a leg up to the States that have a change in the number of U.S. Representatives.

It doesn't matter if you change the number of representatives because all the states have to change the boundaries anyway (even single district states have local elections).
Logged
danny
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,767
Israel


« Reply #13 on: March 16, 2011, 01:23:05 PM »

And both Minneapolis and St. Paul were almost flat, Minneapolis actually lost a total of just 40 people.
Logged
danny
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,767
Israel


« Reply #14 on: March 24, 2011, 08:12:54 PM »


Interesting.  Harlem is getting less and less black.  Charlie Rangel will be representing a majority Hispanic district before long - if he isn't already.

Rangel's district actually became less Hispanic in the last 10 years it was 48% Hispanic in 2000 and 46% in 2010, while blacks went from 30% to 26%. It's whites that gained going from 16% to 21%.
Logged
danny
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,767
Israel


« Reply #15 on: May 23, 2013, 11:22:40 AM »

City and town estimates for July 1, 2012 were just released by the Census. The press release highlights the growth in TX.

I don't think of San Marcos as a large city.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 12 queries.