Swiss set to oust foreign criminals
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 04:20:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Swiss set to oust foreign criminals
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Swiss set to oust foreign criminals  (Read 3059 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: November 28, 2010, 09:34:06 AM »

BTW:

The Swiss voters today also rejected a proposition to increase taxes for the rich.

It was rejected by about 60%.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: November 28, 2010, 09:44:23 AM »

Thurgau the latest canton to report: 61.1% YES
Logged
Insula Dei
belgiansocialist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: November 28, 2010, 09:45:54 AM »

Sad
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: November 28, 2010, 09:55:56 AM »

The canton of Bern is currently more than 60% for YES.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: November 28, 2010, 09:58:21 AM »

The canton of Luzern is with 55.2% for YES.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: November 28, 2010, 09:59:59 AM »

Freiburg voted with 51.4% for NO.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: November 28, 2010, 10:04:50 AM »

Tessin votes about 61% YES.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: November 28, 2010, 10:21:28 AM »

I´ve calculated the most likely final results and it will be something like:

1.41 Mio. YES votes (53.2%)
1.24 Mio. NO votes (46.8%)
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,778


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: November 28, 2010, 11:08:40 AM »

The US really needs to learn to be as sophisticated and progressive as Europe.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: November 28, 2010, 11:55:21 AM »

The US really needs to learn to be as sophisticated and progressive as Europe.

Don't forget how racist America is too!
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: November 28, 2010, 12:20:27 PM »

Does this mean Tina Turner has to move to Detroit?
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: November 28, 2010, 12:26:29 PM »

Does this mean Tina Turner has to move to Detroit?

If she murdered someone in Switzerland, or severely injured someone, defrauded Social Security or was involved in some case of severe burglary - then yes.

If she's just a foreigner in Switzerland who was not involved in a serious crime - then not.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: November 28, 2010, 12:38:07 PM »

Does this mean Tina Turner has to move to Detroit?

If she murdered someone in Switzerland, or severely injured someone, defrauded Social Security or was involved in some case of severe burglary - then yes.

If she's just a foreigner in Switzerland who was not involved in a serious crime - then not.

I can't believe you took my comment seriously.  Smiley
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: November 28, 2010, 01:03:29 PM »

I'm still trying to figure out how anybody could be against this....shouldn't this be the default?
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: November 28, 2010, 01:13:42 PM »

I'm still trying to figure out how anybody could be against this....shouldn't this be the default?

I really don't have all that much against the principle...but just imagine what the European press would be doing if the U.S. passed this.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,026
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: November 28, 2010, 01:15:57 PM »

The US really needs to learn to be as sophisticated and progressive as Europe.

Uh, this basically is already the current situation in the US. It's basically a given that any non-citizen who commits a felony will be deported. Actually is there any country that doesn't have such a policy or is this doing something different than I'm missing in this?

I'm still trying to figure out how anybody could be against this....shouldn't this be the default?

I really don't have all that much against the principle...but just imagine what the European press would be doing if the U.S. passed this.

Uh, non-citizen felons aren't deported?
Logged
Bunwahaha [still dunno why, but well, so be it]
tsionebreicruoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: November 29, 2010, 12:59:50 PM »

Actually is there any country that doesn't have such a policy or is this doing something different than I'm missing in this?

France had it fully applied till 2003. In 2003, for the sake of this country, this law has been modified, to prevent an expulsion of the country (which sometimes could even be an interdiction of the territory) for people who arrived in France before 13, for those who spent a long time of their life in France, 10 years I think, for those who have built a family here. Only cases for which the judge don't have to take into account the above criteria being if the crime is about threatening 'high interests of the country' or terrorism. Interestingly enough it happened through Sarkozy Minister of Interior.

A change of the law which I find fully normal. When someone has an other nationality but arrived in the country early in his/her life, mainly knew this country, and/or spent enough time here to have his/her main ties, and/or has a family here, it just doesn't make sense to expel him, except if being harsh against people just because you think it's fine to be harsh only to be harsh makes sense for you. It prevents to pointlessly destroy a person still more, and at worst to destroy a family in the same time. Depends what's your point is when you punish someone, screwing him/her, or just punishing him/her and trying to make him/her better...

I'm still trying to figure out how anybody could be against this....shouldn't this be the default?

Not for me, see above.

I'm still trying to figure out how anybody could be against this....shouldn't this be the default?

I really don't have all that much against the principle...but just imagine what the European press would be doing if the U.S. passed this.

French media didn't give a f**k to what happened in Arizona. Maybe you had a bunch of articles in some papers, but nothing noticeable.

Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,320
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: November 30, 2010, 04:38:26 AM »

Does this mean Tina Turner has to move to Detroit?

If she murdered someone in Switzerland, or severely injured someone, defrauded Social Security or was involved in some case of severe burglary - then yes.

If she's just a foreigner in Switzerland who was not involved in a serious crime - then not.

I can't believe you took my comment seriously.  Smiley

I thought you were making a joke about crimes against music; but I couldn't think what she's sung that would qualify.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: November 30, 2010, 05:11:01 AM »

Map:



Green = Yes
Pink = No
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: November 30, 2010, 08:01:31 AM »

Good.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: December 05, 2010, 02:03:25 AM »

Switzerland is really extreme, wow.

oh Franzl, how wrong you are ... Wink

Umfrage: Mehrheit für Abschiebung straffälliger Ausländer

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Translation: An Emnid poll in Germany shows 68% of Germans support an automatical deportation of foreigners who committed serious crimes like murder, rape, burglary and social security abuse, while just 26% are opposed.

85% of Left Party voters support deportation, CDU/CSU voters with 75%, SPD voters 67%.

Only Green voters are slightly opposed by 47-49.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.236 seconds with 12 queries.