US House Redistricting: Wisconsin (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 03:27:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  US House Redistricting: Wisconsin (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: US House Redistricting: Wisconsin  (Read 28781 times)
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,828
Marshall Islands


« on: March 14, 2011, 12:43:19 AM »

These are going to be off-season elections, with unpredictable turnout. What are the requirements for the recall?
You gather a lot of signatures on petitions (25% of the gubernatorial vote in the district) within 60 days, then if there are enough signatures, they have a new election, including the possibility of primaries if there are more than one candidate filing within a party.  The incumbent is presumed to have filed, unless they resign.  So rather than a recall, it might be better characterized as "do overs".

Wisconsin does not have party registration, and independents can run on a slogan of up to five words.  So there is the possibility of all kinds of mischief.  You might get some ultra lefties nominated in a Democratic primary who demand a doubling of taxes.  Or an independent might run on a slogan of "Recall All Legislators", which might draw votes from both parties, so you might not get clear cut results.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,828
Marshall Islands


« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2011, 01:12:04 AM »

So, that's what I've gathered. In particular, you don't need any more votes that were cast for the winners last November: if 5% turn out and 51% of that votes for somebody other than the incumbent, the incumbent's out. Which means that if turnout is low - and how high can it be in July of an odd-numbered year? - GOTV is going to decide a lot. For once, the unions might, in fact, be quite relevant Smiley
No its not really a recall, so much as a do-over.

The incumbent is just another candidate.  The only thing special is that he doesn't have to actually file for election.  He goes on the ballot, unless he resigns.  Everyone else files just like it was a special election.  It's not everyone vs. the incumbent, its everyone for themselves.  There can be an extra round of primaries if more than one candidate files for a party nomination.  Since each election is separate, these may really get strung out.

Schedule is like this: 60 days to gather petitions; 31 days to validate (and it appears like this part can get pushed into court real easily); 6 weeks until the election; but if a primary is needed, then it takes the place of the special election, and the special election is 4 weeks after that.  We're easily past the start of the fiscal biennium before anything is resolved.

The recall law applies to all elected officials (even federal officials, but that is probably not enforceable).  You could possibly see bunches of school board members and county officials facing recall elections when they start firing people.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,828
Marshall Islands


« Reply #2 on: March 15, 2011, 01:17:28 AM »

  I've been kind of puzzled by the whole recall thing too.  The first person the Unions make a TV/internet add against and go after is Luther Olson (R-14).  I was born and raised in the Wi 14th Senate District and my first political experience was campaigning for the Democratic nominee for State Senate in that District back in 1984 (before half the people on this board were actually born :->)
  That District was gerrymandered to be a solid GOP district in the early 80's and remains so today.  It is a long swath of mostly rural territory stretching from Clinonville in the northeast to Wisconsin Dells in the southwest and including strong GOP counties such as Waupaca, Waushara, Green Lake, and Marquette. 
 I find it incredibly puzzling that the unions can get off wasting money going after someone in about as safe a district as you can get.  Most people who contribute are from out of the area and don't have familiarity with the district and the fact that they are tossing their money into the wind.

Ill Ind

Well, to be honest I think the State Democrats are either trying to show they're serious about recalling EVERYONE they can, or are vastly overestimating their current level of support.  Probably a mix of both actually.
The Republicans filed first (you have to announce your petition drive and have 60 days to complete it).  They said they were going to recall the Democratic senators for not showing up.   They couldn't very easily say that they were only recalling Democrats from vulnerable areas who weren't showing up, so they were all filed on.  The Democrats are almost forced to follow suit.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,828
Marshall Islands


« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2012, 09:27:32 PM »

2 districts in the Assembly map were thrown out in Milwaukee.

http://media.jsonline.com/documents/baldus-decision-032212.pdf

No partisan effect. Judges are treading very cautiously on rewriting legislative maps after Perry v Perez.

Indeed, to  avoid disrupting other lines, the court emphasizes that the re-drawing of the lines for Districts 8 and 9 must occur within the combined outer boundaries of those two districts.
The court said HCVAP should have been used.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.