Which map is more likely at this point?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 11:16:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Which map is more likely at this point?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Poll
Question: See above
#1
Map A
 
#2
Map B
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 65

Author Topic: Which map is more likely at this point?  (Read 6544 times)
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: December 20, 2010, 05:23:43 PM »

Map A's more likely, which isn't to say that it's very likely at all.
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: December 20, 2010, 06:13:41 PM »

MAP A
Logged
Grumpier Than Uncle Joe
GM3PRP
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,080
Greece
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: December 21, 2010, 10:31:34 AM »

Seems to me that Map B depends on a particularly good Republican candidate, better than the names tossed around right now.    So by default A is more likely.  


I could see the country turning on Obama so much that any Republican who isn't a walking gaffe machine does quite well as the country embraces "change", but I could just be pessimistic.

To that point, George H.W. Bush wasn't a particularly good or inspiring candidate in 1988, but he had a good campaign and good macro conditions against a vulnerable opponent, so he won by a sizable margin.

Makes me wonder if Palin could be any worse than Dukakis.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: December 21, 2010, 11:05:52 AM »



I might keep NJ red in any situation, since has such a huge African American vote.  

Yeah, it prevented Christie from getting elected governor.
Logged
fezzyfestoon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,204
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: December 21, 2010, 03:00:05 PM »

I might keep NJ red in any situation, since has such a huge African American vote. 
Yeah, it prevented Christie from getting elected governor.

New Jersey's local and national voting are completely different.

It's amusing to see the Republicans vote map B.  Are they aware of reality at this point?  NONE of the candidates they're contemplating could even come close to pulling off a victory like that.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: December 21, 2010, 03:04:45 PM »

I might keep NJ red in any situation, since has such a huge African American vote. 
Yeah, it prevented Christie from getting elected governor.

New Jersey's local and national voting are completely different.

It's amusing to see the Republicans vote map B.  Are they aware of reality at this point?  NONE of the candidates they're contemplating could even come close to pulling off a victory like that.

Pence could easily have that map if the vote takes place in the midst of a double dip with 10% unemployment
Logged
fezzyfestoon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,204
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: December 21, 2010, 03:09:02 PM »

Right, because so many candidates were performing so well against Obama in polls during the worst of the recession.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: December 21, 2010, 04:14:57 PM »

I might keep NJ red in any situation, since has such a huge African American vote. 
Yeah, it prevented Christie from getting elected governor.

New Jersey's local and national voting are completely different.

It's amusing to see the Republicans vote map B.  Are they aware of reality at this point?  NONE of the candidates they're contemplating could even come close to pulling off a victory like that.

While true, NJ's vote has been creeping GOP compared to the national average throughout the 2000s.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: December 21, 2010, 04:36:06 PM »

Right, because so many candidates were performing so well against Obama in polls during the worst of the recession.

1)  Obama is going to own the economy, for better or worse, much more in 2012 than he has to date.
2)  the candidates in the polls are weighed down by a) Palin being the face of the GOP, and b) their own flaws (e.g. Romney, Huck, etc).  Once Palin is out of the way, if someone like Pence wins the nomination, he may actually poll better than the "generic Republican"
Logged
albaleman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,212
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.77, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: December 21, 2010, 04:37:34 PM »

Map 1 for sure. Map 2 is possible, but it would require a strong Republican candidate, which I don't think the GOP has. Map 1 is very possible especially considering the weak Republican field.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,948


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: December 21, 2010, 04:44:39 PM »

I might keep NJ red in any situation, since has such a huge African American vote. 
Yeah, it prevented Christie from getting elected governor.

New Jersey's local and national voting are completely different.

It's amusing to see the Republicans vote map B.  Are they aware of reality at this point?  NONE of the candidates they're contemplating could even come close to pulling off a victory like that.

While true, NJ's vote has been creeping GOP compared to the national average throughout the 2000s.

That's primarily a correction from a massive swing to the Dems in the 1990s. There's been demographic change over that time which is not helpful to Republicans and not bringing back 1988. (Weird to think George H.W. Bush actually campaigned in my home town back then... McCain wouldn't have dreamed of it.)
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: December 21, 2010, 04:44:51 PM »

Right, because so many candidates were performing so well against Obama in polls during the worst of the recession.

Recession was over just 5 months after Obama took office.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: December 21, 2010, 04:45:56 PM »

I might keep NJ red in any situation, since has such a huge African American vote. 
Yeah, it prevented Christie from getting elected governor.

New Jersey's local and national voting are completely different.

It's amusing to see the Republicans vote map B.  Are they aware of reality at this point?  NONE of the candidates they're contemplating could even come close to pulling off a victory like that.

While true, NJ's vote has been creeping GOP compared to the national average throughout the 2000s.

That's primarily a correction from a massive swing to the Dems in the 1990s. There's been demographic change over that time which is not helpful to Republicans and not bringing back 1988. (Weird to think George H.W. Bush actually campaigned in my home town back then... McCain wouldn't have dreamed of it.)

Interestingly McCain 08 > Bush 00. But there were some heavy R swings in places like Ocean.
Logged
fezzyfestoon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,204
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: December 21, 2010, 04:56:12 PM »

Right, because so many candidates were performing so well against Obama in polls during the worst of the recession.
Recession was over just 5 months after Obama took office.

Yeah, technically.  No one really feels like it's over even now.

While true, NJ's vote has been creeping GOP compared to the national average throughout the 2000s.

Exactly, creeping.  It's still nowhere close to being Republican nationally.  Plus, it's really becoming more polarized rather than a uniform trend.  And brittain's right, it's more of a correction anyway.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,948


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: December 21, 2010, 05:10:27 PM »

Interestingly McCain 08 > Bush 00. But there were some heavy R swings in places like Ocean.

Olds.
Logged
auburntiger
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,233
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.61, S: 0.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: December 21, 2010, 06:01:24 PM »

Since I have to vote for one or the other, Map B. But my map would be something close to a 1976 defeat of the sitting president. 2008 was a perfect storm for Democrats across the board, which won't be taking place two years from now. Could Obama win? yes, but it would be a 1916-style reelection if that happens.
Logged
anvi
anvikshiki
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,400
Netherlands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: December 24, 2010, 10:10:29 AM »

I don't think either map is realistic.  If Obama is reelected, I think he'll be getting somewhere in between 300-320 electoral votes.  If he loses, he will barely lose, getting somewhere between 240-260 electoral votes.  The only possibility for map B, as others have mentioned, would be unaffected or rising unemployment between now and the fall of '12.
Logged
-
KS21
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,901
Political Matrix
E: -0.97, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: December 24, 2010, 01:13:00 PM »

A
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: December 24, 2010, 01:15:31 PM »
« Edited: December 24, 2010, 01:17:24 PM by Torie »

That Pubbie landslide map is ludicrous - just ludicrous. The 1996 map means that Obama largely sorted out his problems. I see a map like that if Obama and the Pubbies can come together on writing a new tax code.
Logged
feeblepizza
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,910
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: -0.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: December 24, 2010, 03:54:28 PM »

Map A, although I think that neither will happen. He will lose reelection in a close race, probably depending on Virginia and Colorado.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: December 24, 2010, 03:56:59 PM »

Map A by a really good margin in my mind.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: December 24, 2010, 03:58:36 PM »

Map A, although I think that neither will happen. He will lose reelection in a close race, probably depending on Virginia and Colorado.

If Mike Bennet won CO with 40% or so approval, Obama should win it also.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: December 24, 2010, 04:00:00 PM »

Map A, although I think that neither will happen. He will lose reelection in a close race, probably depending on Virginia and Colorado.

If Mike Bennet won CO with 40% or so approval, Obama should win it also.

His opponent was crazy and sexist that is why Bennett won. Obama should be so lucky.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: December 24, 2010, 04:02:03 PM »

Map B I can conceive of happening, Map A could not possibly happen.  The level of economic growth required to reach Map A is not possible.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: December 24, 2010, 04:02:58 PM »

Map A, although I think that neither will happen. He will lose reelection in a close race, probably depending on Virginia and Colorado.

If Mike Bennet won CO with 40% or so approval, Obama should win it also.

His opponent was crazy and sexist that is why Bennett won. Obama should be so lucky.

Colorado is trending towards the Democrats and has been for a long time. You can't just sit there in denial. That's how you guys lost all of New England.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 15 queries.