But why don't they move to a more inner suburb?
People who live in the city are used to having crossing guards at every street corner, so they accept nannystatism. They reason that were it not for the state, they would be limited to their own block and couldn't work or get food. They have effectively become both physically and mentally crippled.
Those who live in the exurbs, realize that after they drive down to the mailbox to pick up their mail, that they can keep on going and drive to the Walmart or their job at the munitions factory. They become empowered and self-reliant.
Presumably they built those roads themselves.
After they cleared the forests, tamed the rivers, and broke the sod.
You mean they drive down the driveway to get the mail delivered by the United States Postal Service, then drive on the roads and highways paid for by the local, state, and federal governments before arriving at Wal-Mart, a corporation that takes advantage of umpteen tax benefits and liberal trade pacts with various nations in order to import cheap products to sell to exurbanites before they drive, once again, on government roads to arrive at the munitions factory, whose biggest customer is the United States Defense Department... which uses the arms produced at the factory to start conflicts in nations with which we have ideological disagreements with, that they too might adopt a democratic form of government that can hold the people in check and keep them from being a threat to the United States.
Seriously Jim.. I hope that entire post you made was 100% facetious. You'd find if we got rid of all subsidies, exurbanites would find their way of life far too expensive and they'd be stuck in a mediocre apartment bloc with all the undesirables and libruls.