FL-PPP: Obama leads Romney by 2, Huckabee/Gingrich by 5, Palin by 14 (!)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 03:08:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  FL-PPP: Obama leads Romney by 2, Huckabee/Gingrich by 5, Palin by 14 (!)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: FL-PPP: Obama leads Romney by 2, Huckabee/Gingrich by 5, Palin by 14 (!)  (Read 3052 times)
Oakvale
oakvale
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,827
Ukraine
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 22, 2010, 09:48:33 AM »

http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2010/12/obama-posts-early-lead-in-florida.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Haha, Palin.
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2010, 09:52:26 AM »

Obama will win florida by a larger margin than in 2008 =).
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 22, 2010, 10:38:54 AM »

a. Barack Obama 46% Mitt Romney 44%

b. Barack Obama 49% Mike Huckabee 44%

c. Barack Obama 47% Newt Gingrich 42%

d. Barack Obama 52% Sarah Palin 38%

e. Barack Obama 48% Marco Rubio 40%

Fav Ratings:

a. Mitt Romney 43%/38% for +5%.

b. Marco Rubio 43%/42% for +1%.

c. Mike Huckabee 41%/43% for -2%.

d. Newt Gingrich 36%/47% for -11%.

e. Sarah Palin 36%/57% for -21%.
Logged
Devilman88
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,498


Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 22, 2010, 12:16:59 PM »

guys, you are getting all hype up on polls two years out, these polls mean nothing. If I remember right, two years out 2008 was suppose to be a Clinton vs giuliani race and the Republicans looking like they were going to win.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 22, 2010, 02:52:49 PM »

guys, you are getting all hype up on polls two years out, these polls mean nothing. If I remember right, two years out 2008 was suppose to be a Clinton vs giuliani race and the Republicans looking like they were going to win.

The point isn't to conclude that 'Obama is going to win', but that he can win.  We'd written him off, and yet he's still polling well and the economy is only going to get better (though perhaps in the end not good enough).
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 22, 2010, 02:57:21 PM »

guys, you are getting all hype up on polls two years out, these polls mean nothing. If I remember right, two years out 2008 was suppose to be a Clinton vs giuliani race and the Republicans looking like they were going to win.

The point isn't to conclude that 'Obama is going to win', but that he can win.  We'd written him off, and yet he's still polling well and the economy is only going to get better (though perhaps in the end not good enough).

We never wrote him off, and I'd wager that most people here think he'll win. Whether he'll win or not will unfold over the course of the next two years, and it is ridiculous that we are making such bold assumptions.

a. Barack Obama 46% Mitt Romney 44%

b. Barack Obama 49% Mike Huckabee 44%

c. Barack Obama 47% Newt Gingrich 42%

d. Barack Obama 52% Sarah Palin 38%

e. Barack Obama 48% Marco Rubio 40%

Fav Ratings:

a. Mitt Romney 43%/38% for +5%.

b. Marco Rubio 43%/42% for +1%.

c. Mike Huckabee 41%/43% for -2%.

d. Newt Gingrich 36%/47% for -11%.

e. Sarah Palin 36%/57% for -21%.


Rubio's favorability rating is only 43/42, and lower then Romney's? Yeah, right... Roll Eyes

Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,471
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 22, 2010, 03:01:38 PM »

Something must have went wrong with their sample of indies and maybe their sample of Dems too. Only a 10% difference in their approvals of him? Uhh...
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 22, 2010, 03:05:28 PM »

We never wrote him off, and I'd wager that most people here think he'll win.

Oh I see.  I had pretty much written him off, but I'll be the first to admit that's my own failing.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 22, 2010, 03:26:40 PM »

LOL
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 22, 2010, 09:36:38 PM »

guys, you are getting all hype up on polls two years out, these polls mean nothing. If I remember right, two years out 2008 was suppose to be a Clinton vs giuliani race and the Republicans looking like they were going to win.

It's all that we have for now. Sheesh! There's nothing that we can predict with absolute certainty about 2012 except that there will be a 2012. For all that we know the shockwave of a supernova or a gamma ray blast could hit us before then and bring about human extinction. There might be no people, but time just wouldn't stop without us.   

But back to the basic discussion. We all make assumptions, and mine are:

1. That so far, President Obama does well at the Lichtman test that predicts the results of Presidential campaigns or is highly likely to do so.

2. He on big in 2008, well enough to lose a little support in the next election and still win decisively.

3. He had a superb campaign apparatus in 2008 and he will pull it out of mothballs in 2012. 

4. The GOP field of potential opponents is very flawed. Any strong opponent is hard to see now -- and it is generally impossible to see what isn't there except for a mirage. The GOP basically will need a new Ronald Reagan to beat President Obama.

5. His political skills are d@mn good. He has gotten much legislation passed -- and if little passes between now and November 2012, then guess who gets the blame!

6. He is in a "Heads I win, tails you lose" situation in the economy. The GOP takeover of the House of Representatives practically ensures that he can take advantage of any radicalism or extremism among Republicans in the event of an economic downturn. If the economy strengthens, he takes credit for what he and the Democratic majority in the Congress did before 2011.   
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,496
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 23, 2010, 02:21:30 AM »

On the topic of GOP candidates:

I don't think Gingrich has a real constituency in the GOP. He was hated by Republicans and Democrats alike in Congress, and he's just too intellectually arrogant for the GOP.

Romney and Huckabee split the party between business conservatives and religious conservatives, respectively. Ideally for them, they would need someone who is well-liked enough by both the establishment and the rank-and-file, but more importantly, someone who is well-known.

Huckabee likely has the highest ceiling against Obama. I think it could very well be him. If not him, then Romney.

Of course, the GOP could be stupid and nominate someone crazy like Palin or Rick Perry.



Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 23, 2010, 02:10:37 PM »

Obama vs. Huckabee



Obama vs. Romney



Obama vs. Gingrich



Obama vs. Palin

Logged
Mjh
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 255


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 23, 2010, 03:49:52 PM »

Obama will win florida by a larger margin than in 2008 =).

Maybe with Sarah Palin on the GOP-ticket. Otherwise it will be a toss-up.
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 24, 2010, 11:03:53 AM »

Obama will win florida by a larger margin than in 2008 =).

Maybe with Sarah Palin on the GOP-ticket. Otherwise it will be a toss-up.

Not really, only romney has a smaller deficit than mccain in 2008 against obama. and roimney won't win the primary Wink
Logged
albaleman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,212
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.77, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 24, 2010, 11:14:06 AM »

Surprised to see that Romney is doing better than Huckabee.

This poll has to be very bad news for the Republicans. If they can't win FL, they don't have any chance of beating Obama.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 24, 2010, 03:09:19 PM »

Clearly, Romney is the stronget candidate the Republicans could nominate.
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 25, 2010, 07:18:39 AM »

Clearly, Romney is the stronget candidate the Republicans could nominate.

and is still behind obama in NC, OH, VA and FL.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 26, 2010, 05:35:28 PM »

Clearly, Romney is the stronget candidate the Republicans could nominate.

I love how you use one state to demonstrate that.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,169
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 27, 2010, 08:28:05 PM »

Clearly, Romney is the stronget candidate the Republicans could nominate.

I love how you use one state to demonstrate that.

     Indeed, & consider that Huckabee actually manages to pull in NC. Romney just manages to lose FL by a smaller margin.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.07 seconds with 13 queries.