Is It Reasonable To Keep The House at 435 Members? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 10:46:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Is It Reasonable To Keep The House at 435 Members? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ...
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 39

Author Topic: Is It Reasonable To Keep The House at 435 Members?  (Read 3925 times)
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


« on: December 24, 2010, 03:55:10 AM »

Well, states lose relative representation regardless of what the size of the House is. Whether a steadily increasing House size is good for the incentives of Congressmen is ambiguous. It might make it hard to recruit good candidates for districts that are going to be eliminated during the next redistricting, but it might also make it harder for weaker incumbents to lose.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 14 queries.