Is It Reasonable To Keep The House at 435 Members? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 05:22:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Is It Reasonable To Keep The House at 435 Members? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ...
#1
Yes		  
#2
No		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 39

Author Topic: Is It Reasonable To Keep The House at 435 Members?  (Read 3936 times)
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,147
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30
« on: December 23, 2010, 06:56:05 PM »
I don't think it's reasonable at all. The average size of a district after the next reapportionment will be over 700,000. Of course, our country is so large, the size of districts is going to be very large, but it should be around 400,000 to 500,000, which is a more reasonable size.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 14 queries.