US House Redistricting: Kentucky (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 05:57:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  US House Redistricting: Kentucky (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: US House Redistricting: Kentucky  (Read 34327 times)
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« on: April 23, 2011, 12:08:11 PM »

BUMP

Here's what I came up with yesterday.

Given the split redistricting control, I made very minor changes.

Basically, KY-02 trades out parts of 2 Paul counties (Scott and Lincoln) for 2 Conway counties (Bath and Montgomery).


Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2011, 09:27:32 PM »

I don't think Chandler would have to worry much about a challenge from the left. From what I can tell, most KY Democrats are still more conservative than the national party.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2011, 09:40:37 PM »
« Edited: April 24, 2011, 09:45:56 PM by MilesC56 »

This is probably the safest Democratic district that could be drawn (outside of Louisville).

Actually, neither Hal Rogers nor Geoff Davis would live in that district. If the Legislature draws an incumbent-protection plan, we could see a district that looks like this for Chandler.


Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #3 on: April 24, 2011, 10:38:54 PM »

I was just putting that out there. I'm expecting a pretty status quo map.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2011, 05:23:32 PM »

Its sounds like the Legislature may actually pass an incumbent-protection map.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #5 on: November 15, 2011, 09:58:41 PM »

...I don't get it.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #6 on: November 15, 2011, 10:27:02 PM »


At a quick glance, it makes Chandler ever-so-slightly safer. It also makes the Whitfield and Rogers districts somewhat easier to target in the event of retirement and/or death.

I guess I was expecting them to give Chandler more coal/eastern counties
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2011, 12:26:21 AM »

I could maybe see Grimes winning Torie's green district. Kinda depends; she'd have to hold strong in Lexington and not get blown out elsewhere.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #8 on: February 10, 2012, 04:22:20 PM »

Here we have it. This is going to Beshear's desk.



Chandler would have won by between 6000 and 7000 votes in 2010.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #9 on: February 13, 2012, 04:23:48 PM »

Some partisan numbers.

Overall, KY-06 shifts about 1.5% more Democratic.

Old:
McCain- 56.2%
McConnell- 49.3%

New:
McCain- 54.7%
McConnell- 48.3%
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #10 on: August 18, 2013, 12:54:32 AM »

The Democratic House plan has eight pairings that affect both parties equally.

The House Republican leader seems to be warming up to it:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.