MA: Second Amendment to The Mideast Consolidated Elections Statute (Statute)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 03:18:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  MA: Second Amendment to The Mideast Consolidated Elections Statute (Statute)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MA: Second Amendment to The Mideast Consolidated Elections Statute (Statute)  (Read 1182 times)
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 16, 2011, 11:44:19 PM »
« edited: March 26, 2011, 04:24:28 PM by Assemblyman & Queen Mum Inks.LWC »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Sponsor: Inks.LWC
Logged
Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese
JOHN91043353
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,570
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2011, 12:09:37 AM »

This seems reasonable enough.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2011, 01:13:08 PM »

I think the wording makes it what we wanted.  It takes what we have now, but turns it into something that doesn't require 500 words to explain what happens if position 1 ties, 2 ties, 3 ties, etc.  I was gonna do it that way, but then I realized that if we had ties at 2 positions, it'd throw it off, and then we'd have a 1000+ bill for just tie breakers.

So, I think this gets the principle across that if we have a tie in 1st, both are elected and the 3rd seat is elected by using 1st plus 2nd preference votes, and the 4th seat with 1st, 2nd, and 3rd, etc.

If anybody sees any errors or loopholes, let me know.
Logged
The Artist Formerly Known As and Now Again Known As Ogis
agooji
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 674


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2011, 02:52:55 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Shouldn't that be "two?" Forgive me if I am interpreting this wrong, but let's look at this situation:

Candidates A, B, C, D, E, F, and so forth are running for the 5 spots. Candidates A and B get elected after the first and second rounds of counting, respectively. Then, C and D are in a tie in the 3rd round. Both are elected. However, the next round, as per the law as currently written, only counts preferences 1-4 for the 5th assembly spot (since the last round counted was the 3rd and the law dictates that the next round is n+1). One round of counting should be skipped in the place of a tie.



Also, a three-way tie in the 4th round of counting would not be covered by this law explicitly, and it could cause some confusion because it is a fourth-preference count that would require a runoff, but the bill would actually just put in office all 3 candidates.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2011, 02:52:19 PM »

As for your first question, no it should be one.  Under the current law, if we have a tie for first, the third spot is filled by looking at 1st + 2nd preference votes.  We do NOT skip to 1st, second, and third preference votes.

If you guys want this changed, we can.  My bill simply extended the current law so that it's applicable to all elections.

As for the 3-way tie at 4th place (or a 4-way tie at 3rd place, etc), I'll need to think of a way to word that.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2011, 08:48:16 PM »

OK, how's this:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 23, 2011, 08:58:00 PM »

Voting is now open on the following bill.  This will be a 24 hour vote:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 23, 2011, 08:58:37 PM »

AYE
Logged
The Artist Formerly Known As and Now Again Known As Ogis
agooji
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 674


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 23, 2011, 10:45:54 PM »

Aye
Logged
Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese
JOHN91043353
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,570
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 24, 2011, 07:47:44 PM »

  Aye
Logged
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,847


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 24, 2011, 07:50:20 PM »

Aye
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 24, 2011, 09:29:37 PM »
« Edited: March 25, 2011, 02:29:35 AM by Assemblyman & Queen Mum Inks.LWC »

Voting is now closed.  The AYEs are 4, and the NAYs are 0, with one seat vacant.  The AYEs have it, and the bill is passed.  The bill is now passed on to the governor for his signature or veto.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.21 seconds with 13 queries.