Pacific Supreme Council Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 05:27:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Pacific Supreme Council Thread (search mode)
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Pacific Supreme Council Thread  (Read 25096 times)
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« on: January 13, 2011, 01:12:05 AM »

Welcome, one and all to the Pacific Supreme Council!

As the current Lt. Governor, I will be serving as the Leader of the Council, a sort of President Pro Tempore if you will.  It is my responsibility to facilitate debate, votes, and break ties.

So yes, as our first act, I believe we should start creating a Council Rulebook, so we have set procedures for all debates, votes, and other council business.

Sadly, I cannot work on such a task alone for the time being mainly because I'm extremely busy this week, so let us begin brainstorming! Smiley
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2011, 01:36:43 AM »

I don't think we need set rules. The Mideast Assembly worked well for a long time without them.

Well, that is true.  But I just think we should have some sort of guideline so we don't have any issues later on.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2011, 02:24:53 AM »
« Edited: January 13, 2011, 02:26:55 AM by The Right Honourable Director of Halifax, Lt. Gov The Doctor »

Well I started the thread on time, didn't I? Tongue

Anyway, the process according to the law should be something like this:

Law proposed -> Debate for a day or two -> Vote -> Send it to the People's Assembly for a final vote.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2011, 07:40:32 PM »

So yes....who wants to propose the landmark first law?
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2011, 01:24:11 AM »


Well if you guys want to debate whether or not the guidelines should be passed as a law, I won't stop you.Tongue
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #5 on: January 16, 2011, 09:05:36 PM »

Okay, here's a draft:



Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


With Fuzzy's bill, I don't think there are any objections to putting this to a vote.  Voting will be open for a 48 hour period since it's simply procedural rules.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2011, 08:12:12 PM »

Technically the bill has already passed, but I think we should wait for Xahar's vote so the guidelines can't be disputed.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #7 on: January 18, 2011, 06:53:48 PM »


He has three hours.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #8 on: January 18, 2011, 09:45:29 PM »

The vote is closed on the Council Guidelines, a vote of 3 ayes, 0 nays, and 1 abstention.  The floor is now open to proposing new legislation.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #9 on: January 18, 2011, 11:57:01 PM »

I will give 24 hours for any other legislation to be proposed, then open up debate.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #10 on: January 20, 2011, 01:29:52 AM »

Debate is now open on the Taxation of Marijuana Act.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #11 on: January 21, 2011, 07:08:08 PM »

I will call a vote on Fuzzy's bill tonight and continue debate on realistic's bills.  I'll wait till Monday to call a vote on that.  The vote for Fuzzy's bill will beging approximately at 7 PM tonight and end on Sunday at 7 PM (I won't be here on Saturday).
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #12 on: January 21, 2011, 10:40:21 PM »

Btw, debate may continue on Realistic's proposed group of bills.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #13 on: January 24, 2011, 02:49:03 AM »

Sorry if this is a bit late, I was swamped with work when I got back home.

The Taxation of Drugs and Alcohol Beverages Act has passed with a 3-1 majority.

Thanks to realistic for submitting the bill to the People's Assembly in my absence.  Debate on Realistic's bills will continue to tomorrow night at 7 PM, when I will call a 72-hour vote.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #14 on: January 25, 2011, 09:58:26 AM »

The vote is open on both of realistic's bills.  If you wish you amend the bills, let them fail here and then reintroduce them with the amended info.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #15 on: January 27, 2011, 01:20:09 AM »

Partial-Birth Abortion Act has passed 4-0
The Taxation of Prostitiution Act has passed 3-1
The Amendment to the Public Funding of Abortion Act has passed 3-1


x ArchangelZero

The floor is now open to new bills.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #16 on: January 27, 2011, 10:03:03 AM »

On a side-note, I'm starting to find the tandem of the Council passing things and the Assembly voting them down very interesting.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #17 on: January 27, 2011, 06:53:06 PM »

On a side-note, I'm starting to find the tandem of the Council passing things and the Assembly voting them down very interesting.

The problem is that there are only 3 people voting in the Assembly. If you councilors could vote (which would be logicals since you are citizens), the bills would pass.

But that kind of kills the idea of one person, one vote, doesn't it?  We need to push for more active citizen involvement in the Assembly.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #18 on: January 28, 2011, 07:56:03 PM »

On a side-note, I'm starting to find the tandem of the Council passing things and the Assembly voting them down very interesting.

The problem is that there are only 3 people voting in the Assembly. If you councilors could vote (which would be logicals since you are citizens), the bills would pass.

But that kind of kills the idea of one person, one vote, doesn't it?  We need to push for more active citizen involvement in the Assembly.

Each person has one vote in the Assembly, so I don't see where is the problem. In every country, Representatives or other legislators have the right to vote for referendums that involve the whole people.

It is however, in technicality, a bicarmeal legislature.  And the bill states that one man, one vote through the whole process, which is a very democratic way of doing it.
 
Personally, I find this tandem to be good for the region as for the first time in months, we are actually having active debate regarding bills. Tongue
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #19 on: January 29, 2011, 03:21:15 PM »

On a side-note, I'm starting to find the tandem of the Council passing things and the Assembly voting them down very interesting.

The problem is that there are only 3 people voting in the Assembly. If you councilors could vote (which would be logicals since you are citizens), the bills would pass.

But that kind of kills the idea of one person, one vote, doesn't it?  We need to push for more active citizen involvement in the Assembly.

Each person has one vote in the Assembly, so I don't see where is the problem. In every country, Representatives or other legislators have the right to vote for referendums that involve the whole people.

It is however, in technicality, a bicarmeal legislature.  And the bill states that one man, one vote through the whole process, which is a very democratic way of doing it.
 
Personally, I find this tandem to be good for the region as for the first time in months, we are actually having active debate regarding bills. Tongue

Still, considering the level of inactivity in our region, this leaves two or three people the possibility to block any legislative proposal. There were more votes cast in the restricted, elected house than in the universal, illimited one.

Of course, won't that require cooperation between both chambers?  I'll discuss the idea with Oakvale, and we'll see what will happen.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #20 on: January 30, 2011, 01:14:15 AM »

Debate is now open on the Happy Fun Progressive Act.  Voting will commence on Tuesday, 10 PM.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #21 on: January 30, 2011, 03:49:53 PM »


Actually, I have no idea.  I didn't really think about that....though I do know that I can only vote here in the case of a tie breaker.
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #22 on: January 31, 2011, 02:25:52 AM »

To clarify, do you seriously want debate opened on those bills Fuzzy? Tongue
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #23 on: February 04, 2011, 11:55:10 PM »

I think it's fairly clear that the Council is well to the right of the region in general, although I'm not sure why that's the case.

Which only means that both houses have to learn how to compromise (*shudder at the thought* Tongue)
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

« Reply #24 on: February 06, 2011, 01:27:34 AM »

I'll give 24 hours for any other bills to be proposed before I start debate.  If this doesn't get through the Assembly I will eat my hat.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.054 seconds with 14 queries.