Can't say I agree with the ruling, there's really no reason Rahm shouldn't be allowed to run if Santorum was allowed to run in Pennsylvania (I didn't intend that as a jab against Phil. OK, maybe a little.)
And why shouldn't he have been able to run?
I didn't say he shouldn't, just that his situation was the same as Rahm. Santorum really lived in Virginia, not Pennsylvania. He wasn't in Pennsylvania anymore than Rahm is in Chicago.
That is actually an absolutely blatant lie. Santorum visited each of Pennsylvania's 67 counties at least once each year. I think that's way more than the time Rahm spent in Illinois. Thanks for playing though.