why didn't Obama do as good as Mondale in MN 8?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 02:43:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  why didn't Obama do as good as Mondale in MN 8?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: why didn't Obama do as good as Mondale in MN 8?  (Read 1393 times)
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,832
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 10, 2011, 10:09:24 AM »

According to the Almanac of American Politics, Walter Mondale got 59 percent of the vote in Minnesota's 8th congressional district in 1984. Obama only got 53 percent of the vote in that district. Has the boundaries of the district changed since 1984?
Logged
Guderian
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 575


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2011, 10:27:54 AM »

Exurban growth.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,955


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2011, 11:28:05 AM »

Walter Mondale was the perfect candidate for MN-8, while Obama was just good enough. The nexus of issues and parties has changed enough since 1984 that there are more people in the district who'd consider voting R on social issues, for example. Plus there must have been some deindustrialization. Plus some exurban growth.
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 10, 2011, 11:33:28 AM »

. . . Cause Walter Mondale was from Minnesota and Obama wasn't?
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,832
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2011, 03:06:29 PM »


not entirely true. Look at Arapahoe County, Colorado. Used to be hard-core GOP. Now its essentially a swing county due to exurbanification
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 10, 2011, 03:12:30 PM »
« Edited: February 10, 2011, 03:15:30 PM by Alcon »


not entirely true. Look at Arapahoe County, Colorado. Used to be hard-core GOP. Now its essentially a swing county due to exurbanification

Rural northeastern Colorado is not rural Minnesota...and Aurora is not exurban Minnesota, although yeah, exurban Minnesota is more Republican than one would expect.

I think the better question is why a place like Arapahoe County, Colorado, votes so differently from suburban Minnesota.
Logged
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 10, 2011, 03:28:05 PM »

. . . Cause Walter Mondale was from Minnesota and Obama wasn't?

But Obama did a lot better in Minnesota overall (in absolute terms), so that isn't a complete explanation.
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 10, 2011, 04:46:53 PM »

. . . Cause Walter Mondale was from Minnesota and Obama wasn't?

But Obama did a lot better in Minnesota overall (in absolute terms), so that isn't a complete explanation.

Well, are we talking about how they did in the same borders, or same Congressional District?  I assume that MN-8 was smaller in 1984 than it is today, and Duluth comprised a much bigger portion of the district than it did now.
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,832
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 10, 2011, 04:59:15 PM »

i'm talking same congressional district. I'm not sure of what CD 8 looked like in the 80s. I know its always contained Duluth, but i'm not sure what else it contained back then.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,304
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 10, 2011, 10:24:48 PM »

In addition to what others have said, MN-8 is more economically liberal than socially liberal, and economics were a better predictor of presidential voting back then.

The boundaries have certainly changed each census, but they're probably similar enough for the voting results to be close to accurate.

This site has Minn historical CD maps.
Logged
feeblepizza
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,910
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: -0.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 11, 2011, 01:08:17 PM »

Modale was from Obama. Minnesota wasn't.
Logged
ajc0918
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,913
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 11, 2011, 01:15:29 PM »

Modale was from Obama. Minnesota wasn't.

fixed:
Mondale was from Minnesota. Obama wasn't.
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 11, 2011, 01:39:19 PM »

i'm talking same congressional district. I'm not sure of what CD 8 looked like in the 80s. I know its always contained Duluth, but i'm not sure what else it contained back then.

I assume it didn't contain any of the Minneapolis Exurbs, which is the most Republican part of the District currently.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,712
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 11, 2011, 02:13:41 PM »

i'm talking same congressional district. I'm not sure of what CD 8 looked like in the 80s. I know its always contained Duluth, but i'm not sure what else it contained back then.

I assume it didn't contain any of the Minneapolis Exurbs, which is the most Republican part of the District currently.

Those places didn't even exist at the time!
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,712
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 11, 2011, 02:20:03 PM »

Anyway, places change, parties change. And sometimes parties do particularly well in some places and unusually badly - in the same places - in other elections, without either fitting into much of a longterm pattern (on this forum people are far too keen to fit everything into longterm patterns, which is unfortunate because it means people miss the actual longterm patterns). That's a general answer.

But in this case there happens to be a specific one as well; Mondale is from Minnesota and essentially ran as a 'labor Democrat' (for want of a better way of putting it. His appeal was significantly weaker than Obama's overall, but stronger in a couple of traditional industrial districts here and there; he also did a lot better in the Pittsburgh area and the central Appalachian coalfield.
Logged
feeblepizza
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,910
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: -0.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 11, 2011, 04:42:51 PM »

Modale was from Obama. Minnesota wasn't.

fixed:
Mondale was from Minnesota. Obama wasn't.

Thank you.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,040
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 11, 2011, 10:19:13 PM »

In addition to the lack of exurbs Duluth of the Iron Range made up a far larger percentage of the district back then.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,712
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 11, 2011, 10:39:05 PM »

In addition to the lack of exurbs Duluth of the Iron Range made up a far larger percentage of the district back then.

Absolutely as well as relatively, presumably? Or did depopulation start later than I've just assumed?
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,040
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: February 11, 2011, 10:50:12 PM »

In addition to the lack of exurbs Duluth of the Iron Range made up a far larger percentage of the district back then.

Absolutely as well as relatively, presumably? Or did depopulation start later than I've just assumed?

Key word bolded. There were only 6000 more votes cast in St. Louis County in 2008 than in 1984 though.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.231 seconds with 12 queries.