The Wisconsin Cheese Showdown (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 10:48:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  The Wisconsin Cheese Showdown (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Wisconsin Cheese Showdown  (Read 59093 times)
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« on: February 17, 2011, 02:21:58 PM »

I still think Walker's an idiot....but public employee unions are a terrible disease.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2011, 06:39:00 PM »

It appears they've flown to Rockford, Illinois.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2011, 08:07:51 PM »

All soldiers in the war against Corporatism.

ugh....what?
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2011, 08:16:55 PM »

But you said it yourself....what do corporations have to do with public employees?
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2011, 05:05:23 AM »

His point is that both methods obstruct legislative business effectively. Doesn't matter what you call it.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #5 on: February 19, 2011, 01:52:52 AM »

Wisconsin polarized as always.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #6 on: February 22, 2011, 12:50:45 PM »

If the state senate had the votes to abolish collective bargaining now, they could "go nuclear" and do it. They have no reason not to strip that out from the fiscal bill and pass it with their reduced quorum. Many people feared Walker would do it.

But the fact that they haven't and the GOP leader in the State Senate said he would not move on this until the Dems returned is a tell that they haven't got the votes within their caucus to do so.


Alternatively, though....if there isn't a majority in favor of the bill, why are Democrats having a problem showing up? If there aren't enough votes to pass, there would be no reason to stay in Illinois.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #7 on: February 22, 2011, 01:02:27 PM »

Because Walker is refusing to compromise?
Seriously, the guy rejected his own party leader's proposal. Obviously he sees himself as some kind of conservative hero and accepting any kind of compromise will undercut that image.

You misunderstand me.

Brittain was saying that the fact that Republicans aren't using "the nuclear option" means that they don't have the necessary majority to pass the bill.

I'm asking why the Democrats need to flee Wisconsin if the Republicans do not have enough votes. It seems like the only reason to be in Illinois is to prevent a 60% quorum being present....but that only seems logical if they know 50%+ support passing the bill.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #8 on: February 22, 2011, 01:05:02 PM »

A couple of reasons:
1. They don't know the true state of play in the caucus the way the GOP leader does. There are probably senators who are wavering, but not committed no votes.

That's true, yeah.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #9 on: February 22, 2011, 05:59:00 PM »

I'm so sorry to hear that. You have my condoleances.

I wouldn't necessarily go as far as to advocate disallowing them entirely....but public sector unions truly are a disease. A disease whose power needs to be seriously reduced.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #10 on: February 25, 2011, 06:13:22 AM »

I imagine his point is you'd find it hard to survive on your own with your current work.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #11 on: March 09, 2011, 08:18:42 PM »

lol

Why wasn't this done sooner?
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #12 on: March 10, 2011, 07:27:27 PM »

I'm perfectly willing to discuss (at least partial) public financing of campaigns in connection with private spending limits.

Actually seems like a reasonable thing. These political issues shouldn't be about politics.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #13 on: March 10, 2011, 08:03:08 PM »

If money made elections, Tom Foley and Linda McMahon would be Governor and US Senator right now. Oh, and Jerry Brown wouldn't have won by a huge margin in California.

It sure doesn't hurt. Otherwise corporations wouldn't be donating those amounts.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


« Reply #14 on: March 10, 2011, 08:11:21 PM »

Yes. And that's precisely why I would be quite willing to discuss spending caps.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 12 queries.