State Legislature Redistricting (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 06:03:10 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  State Legislature Redistricting (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: State Legislature Redistricting  (Read 32083 times)
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

« on: April 03, 2011, 06:43:21 PM »
« edited: April 03, 2011, 06:46:08 PM by Verily »

Some of their choices are slightly bizarre. They could definitely have created a totally new Democratic district in Morris County by combining Morristown, Morris Plains, Parsippany and Dover (plus the areas near each that are also Democratic) in one seat, but they chose not to do so for whatever reason, instead stranding all of those areas in R seats.

They also stranded some Democrats in LD39 unnecessarily in Closter, Haworth, Demarest, etc. Same with Bound Brook and South Bound Brook in LD23. Meanwhile, LD38 seems to have been made unnecessarily vulnerable; not sure why they didn't put Closter etc. in LD37 and Hackensack in LD38 to shore it up (then Paramus or something in LD39 to balance it out). Loretta Weinberg would have nothing to worry about with Englewood, Teaneck AND Tenafly still in her seat.

LD16 makes more sense than it looks as the parts of Somerset in the seat are marginal to D-leaning.

On the successful-gerrymandering side, they have successfully created a D or at least more likely to flip seat in Monmouth County in LD11 while at the same time pitting star incumbents Jennifer Beck and Sean Kean against each other there.

Diane Allen may lose LD07 now as it has dropped some of the less-D parts. (She really has no business holding it; it's something like 65% Obama.)
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2011, 11:04:51 AM »

BRTD, presidential results are not a good example when determining who will win a legislative race. Most of the time a gubernatorial result makes more sense.

This is far more true in some states than others (and, even within states, in some specific regions/demographic groups than in others). Minnesota does not have much difference between its state and federal voting patterns.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.