SENATE BILL: Do Not PM List Act (Law'd) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 10:44:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: Do Not PM List Act (Law'd) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: Do Not PM List Act (Law'd)  (Read 9647 times)
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96
« on: March 10, 2011, 11:57:54 PM »
This is unnecessary.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2011, 07:18:59 PM »
I disagree with the bill because it:

1) Unnecessarily creates more "work" for the RG
2) We don't really have the power to regulate PMs, and there isn't even a punishment for disobeying it anyway. And how could we prove it if there was?
3) No more stickied threads please.
4) If people ask me to quit PMing them, I do. We shouldn't need a law to mandate common courtesy.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96
« Reply #2 on: March 15, 2011, 03:40:59 PM »
Quote from: Sinner Republican on March 15, 2011, 02:51:26 PM
Quote from: Senator Antonio V on March 15, 2011, 05:12:33 AM

LOL Rowan. It looks like you only job in the Senate is to object to every Amendment just for the sake of complicating everything.

When I objected to the amendment for the Feline bill, it ended up being voted down. If I had not spoken up, we would have passed an amendment that did not have majority support.

It was going to be further amended by Duke's amendment either way. Your "objection" ultimately didn't do anything.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96
« Reply #3 on: March 15, 2011, 08:18:35 PM »
nay
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96
« Reply #4 on: March 28, 2011, 05:25:29 PM »
Motion to table!
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96
« Reply #5 on: March 28, 2011, 07:26:51 PM »
aye
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96
« Reply #6 on: March 28, 2011, 10:53:42 PM »
It's a bad bill and the sponsor doesn't seem to care about it.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96
« Reply #7 on: April 07, 2011, 09:57:18 PM »
nay
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96
« Reply #8 on: April 16, 2011, 02:18:04 PM »
« Edited: April 16, 2011, 02:21:10 PM by bgwah »
Nay! This seems like a pretty clear violation of freedom of speech.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96
« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2011, 03:32:17 PM »
Quote from: Marokai Disaster on April 19, 2011, 06:55:09 AM
Meh. This has no teeth and subsequently is entirely useless. This is really the only alternative we have to formalized deregistration? The "We Would Appreciate it if You Don't PM These People" list?

I doubt this assault on freedom of speech could hold up in court anyway.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 12 queries.