Presidents more important to the country outside of the presidency
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 09:22:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Presidents more important to the country outside of the presidency
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Presidents more important to the country outside of the presidency  (Read 1725 times)
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 31, 2011, 01:43:38 PM »

Let's get the obvious ones out of the way:

William Henry Harrison
Zachary Taylor
James Garfield
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,073
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2011, 01:57:38 PM »

Herbert Hoover deserves a mention.  His presidency was the major black mark on an otherwise stellar career.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2011, 02:12:56 PM »
« Edited: May 31, 2011, 02:16:04 PM by Dom Pedro II »

While I have rather positive opinion of Carter's presidency, he fits this category as well.

I'd say the same about Taft, who was more important as Chief Justice than President.

John Quincy Adams' earlier and later career also seems more vague than four years as President.

Hm, maybe also James Madison. His presidential record wasn't great and he's better known for his work during writing the constitution.

U.S. Grant's achievements as General were far greater and important for the country, than poor Presidency.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2011, 02:15:13 PM »

Thomas Jefferson

As President, Governor of Virgina, and in managing his personal affairs he stunk.  But he was extremely eloquent, and as long as you kept him away from any position where he was the one who was ultimately responsible, he was very competent.  Indeed, in his honor the Peter Principle should be renamed the Thomas Theory.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2011, 02:18:25 PM »
« Edited: May 31, 2011, 02:20:41 PM by Dom Pedro II »

Martin Van Buren too. His legacy lies in being a chief architect of the Democratic Party and one of the very first political operatives, than unimpressive presidency.

I'd also say Adams contributions as a founding father were greater than presidency.

And if we're talking solely about comparing an accomplishment or failures, the winner is James Buchanan. Illustrious public career before a disastrous presidency.
Logged
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2011, 02:38:46 PM »

This is debatable, but...

Eisenhower. He was the Supreme Commander of the Alied Forces in WWII.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,681
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 31, 2011, 10:10:54 PM »

possibly Taft, with his positions as Governor of the Philippines, Sec of War, and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
Logged
bloombergforpresident
obama12
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 376


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 03, 2011, 01:32:16 AM »

Washington because of all he did in the Revolutionary War. but about the same pre-presidency and presidency.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2011, 12:22:02 PM »

Washington because of all he did in the Revolutionary War. but about the same pre-presidency and presidency.

Washington significance as General and as first President basically balances each other.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.223 seconds with 12 queries.