Overrepresented and underrepresented areas in Congress
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 01:32:35 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 15 Down, 35 To Go)
  Overrepresented and underrepresented areas in Congress
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Overrepresented and underrepresented areas in Congress  (Read 7189 times)
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 18, 2011, 04:08:25 PM »

What areas of the United States have enough population to form their own district, but are effectively cracked?

And what areas have disproportionate influence despite their small, and declining populations, due to legacy Congressman and careful redistricting?

Some examples:

Category A:

1. Beaumont/Port Arthur - ~600k people, cracked between 2 districts, and represented by 2 members of the Houston suburbs.

2. Reading PA metro area - Also about 500+k people, cracked between several districts.

3. Akron, Ohio metro area - 700k people, ditto


Category B:

1. St. Louis -  ~350k people, and 2 Congressional districts. Recently rectified.

2. Detroit - Ditto. 600k Detroit blacks get 2 Congressional districts.



Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2011, 06:45:28 PM »

over-rep: Baltimore + Suburbs--about 2 districts worth of population and 4 incumbents.

Under-Rep: Tarrant County Texas, with about 3 Districts worth of population and only 1 Representative.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 18, 2011, 09:11:30 PM »

over-rep: Baltimore + Suburbs--about 2 districts worth of population and 4 incumbents.

Under-Rep: Tarrant County Texas, with about 3 Districts worth of population and only 1 Representative.

I've heard conflicting info on that. Granger is from Ft. Worth. Not sure if Joe Barton is from Arlington or Johnson County. If its the latter, a new GOP Tarrant County district will be drawn this cycle.
Logged
JacobNC
psychicpanda
Rookie
**
Posts: 175
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 18, 2011, 10:56:32 PM »

Salt Lake City, UT - worth 1 democratic district, but it's split up into three heavily republican districts.
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 18, 2011, 11:01:52 PM »

over-rep: Baltimore + Suburbs--about 2 districts worth of population and 4 incumbents.

Under-Rep: Tarrant County Texas, with about 3 Districts worth of population and only 1 Representative.

I've heard conflicting info on that. Granger is from Ft. Worth. Not sure if Joe Barton is from Arlington or Johnson County. If its the latter, a new GOP Tarrant County district will be drawn this cycle.

He's from Ennis, which is in Ellis County.  Johnson COunty is in TX-17, which is Represented by Bill Flores.

Although an Arlington-Johnson County CD is probably a good creation for the GOP, now that they don't need the Dallas Burbs in the 17th to beat Edwards.
Logged
Ban my account ffs!
snowguy716
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,632
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 18, 2011, 11:47:27 PM »

What areas of the United States have enough population to form their own district, but are effectively cracked?

And what areas have disproportionate influence despite their small, and declining populations, due to legacy Congressman and careful redistricting?

Some examples:

Category A:

1. Beaumont/Port Arthur - ~600k people, cracked between 2 districts, and represented by 2 members of the Houston suburbs.

2. Reading PA metro area - Also about 500+k people, cracked between several districts.

3. Akron, Ohio metro area - 700k people, ditto


Category B:

1. St. Louis -  ~350k people, and 2 Congressional districts. Recently rectified.

2. Detroit - Ditto. 600k Detroit blacks get 2 Congressional districts.




The entire state of Texas is overrepresented in congress because illegal immigrants are counted by the census... but they are not citizens and cannot vote.

Sometimes I think house representation should be doled out based on the average number of voters in the past two presidential elections.  You'd see the south's representation plummet while it rose by a ton in the upper midwest and New England.
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 19, 2011, 12:47:30 AM »
« Edited: May 19, 2011, 12:49:07 AM by BigSkyBob »

I suspect the winner is the suburbs of Cook County.

Or should I say, the loser is the suburbs of Cook County?
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 19, 2011, 01:28:56 AM »

Okay, I decided to test this with the 201 US Census Numbers and 2008 election (via NYT website), and here are the Results, compared to the 2010 house district allotment:

Washington: -1
Oregon: + 1
California: -11 (Yes, 11)
Nevada: -1
Arizona: -2
Utah: -1
Montana: +1
Colorado: + 1
Texas: -8
Minnesota: +2
Iowa: +1
Missouri: +2
Louisiana: +1
Wisconsin: +2
Michigan: +3
Ohio: +2
Georgia: -1
North Carolina: +2
Florida: +1
Virginia: +2
West Virginia: -1
Maryland: +1
Pennsylvania: +2
New York: -3
Massachusetts: +1
Maine: +1
Connecticut: +1

And one additional one from Rounding that would probably go to New Hampshire.

And, for the Obama/McCain EVs, the result would have been + 10 Obama from the 2010 Numbers, or +4 form the 2000 Numbers.  Mostly a Shift from Texas and California back to the Midwest.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 19, 2011, 07:35:36 AM »

I suspect the winner is the suburbs of Cook County.

Or should I say, the loser is the suburbs of Cook County?

Probably the loser. Lake is cracked, Will is cracked. Dupage will likely have its 1 rep though.

Cook/Chicago is overrepresented.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,933


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 19, 2011, 09:45:55 AM »

MA: Boston + inner suburbs over-represented; southeastern Mass and Cape underrepresented. Crazy that reps from Sharon, Newton, Worcester, and Southie represent the whole area.

Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 19, 2011, 11:41:32 AM »

lol @ the focus on black districts. Blacks sure are overrepresented, what with their ~7%  of House seats and 0% of Senate seats! Roll Eyes
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 19, 2011, 03:30:35 PM »

Okay, I decided to test this with the 201 US Census Numbers and 2008 election (via NYT website), and here are the Results, compared to the 2010 house district allotment:

And, for the Obama/McCain EVs, the result would have been + 10 Obama from the 2010 Numbers, or +4 form the 2000 Numbers.  Mostly a Shift from Texas and California back to the Midwest.


Interesting results.

Amongst larger states:

New York is pretty fairly allocated, since they don't connect NYC to other parts of the state more than once.

California has an extra seat I believe in the Bay Area for now.

Roanoke, VA I believe has 2 reps that reside in districts that stretch long distances north and west.
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 19, 2011, 03:34:36 PM »

Okay, I decided to test this with the 201 US Census Numbers and 2008 election (via NYT website), and here are the Results, compared to the 2010 house district allotment:

And, for the Obama/McCain EVs, the result would have been + 10 Obama from the 2010 Numbers, or +4 form the 2000 Numbers.  Mostly a Shift from Texas and California back to the Midwest.


Interesting results.

Amongst larger states:

New York is pretty fairly allocated, since they don't connect NYC to other parts of the state more than once.

California has an extra seat I believe in the Bay Area for now.

Roanoke, VA I believe has 2 reps that reside in districts that stretch long distances north and west.

Roanoke itself only has 1 (Bob Goode), but nearby Salem has one.

Speaking of Virginia though, the Tidewater region has 4 districts when it only deserves 2.5, and Rural North Virginia has none when it deserves 1.5.  The region is cracked between the 1st, 6th, 7th, and 10th in order to make all of them more Republican
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,828
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 19, 2011, 09:00:04 PM »

What areas of the United States have enough population to form their own district, but are effectively cracked?

And what areas have disproportionate influence despite their small, and declining populations, due to legacy Congressman and careful redistricting?

Some examples:

Category A:

1. Beaumont/Port Arthur - ~600k people, cracked between 2 districts, and represented by 2 members of the Houston suburbs.
Not even 400K.  The people further north wouldn't want to be in a Beaumont dominated district.
Logged
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 19, 2011, 10:40:54 PM »

lol @ the focus on black districts. Blacks sure are overrepresented, what with their ~7%  of House seats and 0% of Senate seats! Roll Eyes

Blacks as a whole are underrepresented, sure. But there are a few areas in which blacks are overrepresented.
Logged
NY Jew
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 538


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 09, 2011, 11:36:37 AM »

The Orthodox Jewish areas of Flatbush in Brooklyn that are divided in to 5 Congressional districts (8, 9, 10, 11, and 13) this has to be a gerrymandering record (you can also add a few ED's from the next door Orthodox Jewish neighborhood of Borough Park which has some of the 12th in it)
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 09, 2011, 12:26:12 PM »

Once the 2012 redistricting goes into effect, Boston will have a lopsided representation in Congress. Of the state's 9 congressional districts, 4 congressman will be elected from either Boston or a town immediately bordering it. A fifth will live in Medford, which is maybe a 2-minute drive from Boston on I-93.

There will be absolutely no representation for Metrowest (currently split between 5 districts) or any community south of Boston (split into 4).
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: August 09, 2011, 04:26:11 PM »

Underrepresented

Austin
Montana
Columbus

Overrepresented

Manhattan
Rhode Island
Wyoming
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,933


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: August 10, 2011, 09:09:28 AM »

Chicago will continue to have, I think, 5 reps after this election, which is a sizable overrepresentation. Unless Gutierrez or Quigley lives in a suburb.

The metro Twin Cities have the same problem Boston has... both MN-6 and MN-8 have sizable non-metro populations represented by a Republican very close to the cities themselves at one extreme of the district. But that MN-8 problem may be cleared up soon.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: August 10, 2011, 09:20:41 AM »

Middlesex/Mercer County deserves 2 Dem reps but has 1.
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: August 10, 2011, 09:53:18 AM »

Middlesex/Mercer County deserves 2 Dem reps but has 1.

Middlesex in particular is underrepresented at the expense of Monmouth and Ocean.

And I think you mean Middlesex/Union. Mercer County of course has two representatives already (Holt and Smith), which makes it overrepresented.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: August 10, 2011, 11:27:39 AM »

Middlesex/Mercer County deserves 2 Dem reps but has 1.

Middlesex in particular is underrepresented at the expense of Monmouth and Ocean.

And I think you mean Middlesex/Union. Mercer County of course has two representatives already (Holt and Smith), which makes it overrepresented.

Yes, that would be correct. Although I don't think Ocean has a rep, unless you could Runyan's likely vacation home.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: August 10, 2011, 12:00:05 PM »

If we're talking about New Jersey, the Union/Middlesex area is under-represented. You could make an argument that, in a "logical draw" based on communities of interest, the area would have its own seat. Middlesex specifically got the shaft in the 1990 re-draw when New Jersey last lost a seat -- the Middlesex district wound up being the one eliminated (at the expense of shoring up Pallone, who had a marginal district in the 1980s). Ocean County is sort of slighted by virtue of being split between two CDs.

There's only one congressman from Monmouth, and that's Frank Pallone. But he hardly represents any of it -- it's pretty diluted between Smith, Pallone, and Holt. There are some really weird lines at play in NJ. You can't quite say Monmouth is underrepresented, but I doubt Pallone truly acts like he's representing the county.

Mercer is overrepresented, I guess, at the expense of Middlesex.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 12 queries.