why didn't democrats take advantage of people's voting habits? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 11:26:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  why didn't democrats take advantage of people's voting habits? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: why didn't democrats take advantage of people's voting habits?  (Read 841 times)
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« on: May 26, 2011, 07:10:30 PM »

The republicans did this in Illinois. There was a district based in Lake County that was heavily republican but was mostly moderate to liberal Chuck Percy type republicans. Yet they would vote for ted bundy if it had an R next to its name. In 1969, they voted in archconservative Phil Crane. It took the voters 35 years to realize that a nutcase was representing them.

You do realize "that district" has been three different Congressional Districts over the years?  First it was the 13th, then it became the 12th, and then it became the 8th.  Phil Crane didn't survive because the people in the district would vote in Hitler with an R, he survived because his district KEPT CHANGING.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.