I agree with a lot of your reasoning, but what makes you think Eisenhower was more libertarian than Stevenson? I'm genuinely curious. Stevenson, after all, was the once calling for a nuclear freeze and a more diplomatic approach to the Soviet question. Ike also initiated the largest public works programme in human history.
Well Adlai was the candidate who wanted to continue the Korean War in 1952, and that colors my conception of him quite a bit. This is also asking who was the more
personally libertarian candidate, not who would govern more libertarian. I suspect that if both of them had their druthers and could remake the US government from the ground up, then Ike's would be considerably more libertarian.