what would each states' map look like if redistricting power was taken away
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 17, 2024, 08:37:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  what would each states' map look like if redistricting power was taken away
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: what would each states' map look like if redistricting power was taken away  (Read 1354 times)
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,831
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 03, 2011, 10:55:32 PM »

from the legislature? Here is Indiana.

Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2011, 11:05:54 PM »

Are there specific criteria used by the non-legislative mapper? If so, then the priority among those priorities matters as well.
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,829
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2011, 11:32:47 PM »

Taken away from the legislature and given to who, exactly?
Logged
dpmapper
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 442
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 03, 2011, 11:38:36 PM »

from the legislature? Here is Indiana.



You're nuts if you think that Newton/Jasper/Benton counties belong with Gary more than Michigan City does. 
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 04, 2011, 04:33:59 AM »

Michigan City belongs with South Bend more than with Gary - especially as South Bend needs more population to be brought up to par. Newton and Jasper don't belong anywhere else more than with Lake County. Besides, that link is pretty old IIRC. I've more of an issue with the Indy map. I could very well see a commission split the city given what the alternatives are.
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,831
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 04, 2011, 12:46:29 PM »

Here is Alabama. And to answer previous questions, this map would ascribe to the rule that each district cannot have more than two county splits.

Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,831
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 04, 2011, 04:11:16 PM »

Here is Arizona. I know they already do a commission, but here is my map with minimal county splits. By the way, I know the map bleeds on to the other one at the bottom of the screen. In case your wondering Santa Cruz county is in the 8th under this map


Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,831
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2011, 09:05:41 PM »

Here is Arkansas

Logged
dpmapper
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 442
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 04, 2011, 09:22:22 PM »

Here is Alabama. And to answer previous questions, this map would ascribe to the rule that each district cannot have more than two county splits.


That doesn't really answer the question.  Just minimizing the number of county splits still allows for a ton of choice. 
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 04, 2011, 09:31:35 PM »

Here is Alabama. And to answer previous questions, this map would ascribe to the rule that each district cannot have more than two county splits.


That doesn't really answer the question.  Just minimizing the number of county splits still allows for a ton of choice. 

For instance, AL and AZ have VRA issues. Are these addressed in your maps? If so, by what measures?

Other factors include compactness and cores of previous districts. Are they factors? Do you have a maximum population variance? Non-legislative commissions generally have to answer these during their deliberations.
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 04, 2011, 10:33:38 PM »

Here is Alabama. And to answer previous questions, this map would ascribe to the rule that each district cannot have more than two county splits.


That doesn't really answer the question.  Just minimizing the number of county splits still allows for a ton of choice. 

For instance, AL and AZ have VRA issues. Are these addressed in your maps? If so, by what measures?

Other factors include compactness and cores of previous districts. Are they factors? Do you have a maximum population variance? Non-legislative commissions generally have to answer these during their deliberations.

If the question is what district should or ought to be, then the question of what they currently are is totally irrelevent.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 12 queries.