Make an electoral map between the preceding three posters (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:37:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community
  Forum Community Election Match-ups (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Make an electoral map between the preceding three posters (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Make an electoral map between the preceding three posters  (Read 47183 times)
Mopsus
MOPolitico
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,975
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -1.65

« on: June 11, 2011, 03:11:07 PM »

Where's Cathcon to split the conservative vote and allow me to win ?

Skip




Antonio: 483 electoral votes

tb75: 30 electoral votes
Cathcon: 25 electoral votes

The next poster should post the map of the result of an election between Antonio, Yelnoc, and myself.
Logged
Mopsus
MOPolitico
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,975
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -1.65

« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2011, 08:23:43 PM »

I had some fun with this one:




Bullmoose: 385 electoral votes

Belgiansocialist: 153 electoral votes
Grumpy Gramps: 0 electoral votes

Bullmoose wins on the coalition of moderates, independents, suburbanites, and latte liberals. Belgiansocialist mostly wins the urban poor. Alarmed by Bullmoose's social liberalism, most populists and TEA Party eccentrics support the Basil Marceaux/Ross Perot like figure of Grumpy Gramps, who performs strongest in the libertarian West and rube-populated areas of Appalachia and the South.
Logged
Mopsus
MOPolitico
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,975
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -1.65

« Reply #2 on: December 29, 2011, 03:42:49 PM »

I like the template of a Democratic primary used earlier by Antonio for three like-minded posters, so I'll adopt the same one here. This time, Antonio is serving the role of New Deal progressive, Scott of the New Democrat, and Morgan of the left-libertarian.

In Iowa, all three candidates are competitive, but Antonio narrowly comes out on top. The real surprise is Morgan's second-place finish, which gives him enough momentum to upset favorite Scott in the granite state. Scott's campaign appears to be in trouble, but he manages to stay in the race with two decisive victories in South Carolina and Florida. At the end of January, the map looks like this:



On Super Tuesday, Scott's victories are confined to the south, while Antonio wins two states in the midwest, one in the northeast, and one in the west, garnering most of his support from the working class. In a disappointing day for the Morgan campaign, Morgan, who had been hoping for victories in Minnesota, Vermont, and Colorado, won just one of those contests. Despite speculation from the media, Morgan announced that he will stay in the race.



By the end of March, Scott seems to have the election wrapped up. It seems peculiar that a campaign which lost both of the major early states would be so far ahead, but the strategy adopted by Scott after his defeats explains his comeback: While Antonio and Morgan were busy trying to out-liberal each other, Antonio on economic policy and Morgan on social and foreign policy, more middle-of-the-road voters felt dissatisfied with the two major candidates. Recognizing this divide, Scott emphasized his more centrist and third way positions to gain the support of this left-out constituency. The strategy seems to have worked. Morgan officially withdraws from the race and throws his support behind Antonio. It's now up to him to stop this juggernaut which seems destined to capture the nomination.



Antonio puts up a commendable fight, but it's too late. The momentum is on Scott's side, and it's impossible to stop. Following Scott's victory in the New York primary, Antonio sees that continued resistance is futile, and he, too, withdraws. Here's the map following the New York primary:



And the map on the day of the convention:

Logged
Mopsus
MOPolitico
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,975
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -1.65

« Reply #3 on: June 12, 2014, 10:30:25 AM »

Continued from: https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=133668.325

As it turns out, the millionaires in the House of Representatives didn't take kindly to Senator TNF's rhetoric; Senator Goldwater was elected President of the United States in a landslide.

After four years, Senator Terrance Nelson Fitzgerald is ready for a rematch. This time, however, another candidate is thrown in the mix: Private citizen Benjamin Yves Shua. Criticizing President Barry Goldwater III's aggressive use of the military - particularly his choice to intervene in Syria and Ukraine - while taking a more moderate approach to economic and social issues than Senator TNF, Mr. Shua hopes to reach out to voters who feel turned off to the other two candidates.



Benjamin Yves Shua: 282 Electoral Votes
President Barry Goldwater III: 179 Electoral Votes
Senator Terrance Nelson Fitzgerald: 77 Electoral Votes
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 13 queries.