is the reasons why the Indiana republicans didn't go overly aggressive (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 07:01:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  is the reasons why the Indiana republicans didn't go overly aggressive (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: is the reasons why the Indiana republicans didn't go overly aggressive  (Read 2164 times)
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,210


« on: June 16, 2011, 07:36:28 PM »

stranger things have happened. Earl Landgrebe lost in a district that had been held by republicans for 40 years, gave Nixon 74% of the vote in 1972, and had given Nixon 57% of the vote in the three-way 1968 race.

granted, Landgrebe never solidified his support in primaries and is best known for sticking by Nixon all the way to August 9th, 1974. And Landgrebe lost by 22% too.

(Landgrebe also ran 20% behind Nixon in 1972 anyways).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.