is the reasons why the Indiana republicans didn't go overly aggressive (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 10:15:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  is the reasons why the Indiana republicans didn't go overly aggressive (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: is the reasons why the Indiana republicans didn't go overly aggressive  (Read 2153 times)
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,831
United States


« on: June 12, 2011, 10:18:54 PM »

on the new maps, is that they knew they could possibly end up 3-6 or 2-7 in a remotely bad year? IIRC, in 1971 they tried to put the black/democrat areas of Indianapolis in two districts, the old eleventh and the sixth. They tried to get rid of Jacobs and thought that William Bray would be fine because he was a sr incumbent. So in 1973 and 1974 they had a 7-4 delegation. However in the 1974 elections, both Indianapolis seats went democrat and Charlie Halleck's old seat went democratic (partly because the guy representing the seat was a fierce partisan) and the area in the current sixth (then called the tenth) went democratic as did the bloody eighth as the democrats now had a 9-2 delegation. Even after the 1980 elections they still had a 6-5 dem delegation.

In 1981, the legislature successfully eliminated Halleck's district by taking all the dem areas and stuffing it in the 1st district and the rest was combined in the 5th (one of only two districts that stayed republican all through the 70s). Fithian, not wanting to face off against Hillis, decided to run for the senate. They then avoided making the same mistake in Indianapolis by putting all the democrats into one district (a district that even voted for Walter Mondale) while making a new district for Senator Dan Burton (who tried running for congress in the early 70s). The problem was that although the new tenth district (the old tenth became the second) was a dem vote sink, the new sixth was also a gop vote sink that often gave republican candidates up to 75 percent of the vote. It hurt them elsewhere and by 1991 the democrats had a 8-2 delegation.
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,831
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2011, 10:49:07 PM »

stranger things have happened. Earl Landgrebe lost in a district that had been held by republicans for 40 years, gave Nixon 74% of the vote in 1972, and had given Nixon 57% of the vote in the three-way 1968 race.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.