Voting Requirements Amendment (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 11:07:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Voting Requirements Amendment (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Voting Requirements Amendment  (Read 7505 times)
Defarge
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,588


Political Matrix
E: -3.13, S: -0.72

« on: December 13, 2004, 06:43:29 PM »

I agree with the comments of my fellow Senators, 100 posts is excessive.  50 is enough.
Logged
Defarge
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,588


Political Matrix
E: -3.13, S: -0.72

« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2004, 06:51:58 PM »

I agree with the comments of my fellow Senators, 100 posts is excessive.  50 is enough.
How is 100 excessive. 100 posts takes, maybe, two weeks tops to get.
If you are very vocal and post regularly it will take two weeks to get.  It took me months to get to 100 posts because I did not feel confident in posting until I was intimately familiar with Atlasia.  The same is true with many other lurkers out there.
Logged
Defarge
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,588


Political Matrix
E: -3.13, S: -0.72

« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2004, 09:17:52 PM »

Nay, for the objections Senator StatesRights has so excellently presented.
Logged
Defarge
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,588


Political Matrix
E: -3.13, S: -0.72

« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2004, 09:36:31 PM »

I stand by my vote also for my previous objections that 100 posts is far too high.  50 posts is fine, but 100 is excessive.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.