Opinion of the previous poster's PM score

[TJ in Oregon]

Seems to about right from his posts so far. I would have guess the social score to be a little lower but I'm not terribly suprised considering I find him to be one of the more likeable liberals on this forum. I'd prefer both scores to be about 10 points higher if I wanted agreement for voting purposes and such.

[TJ in Oregon]

I just took the PM test again without critical checks and got:

E+2.97  S+5.57

As you can see it makes a pretty decent difference to the S+7.30 that Mint seems to think is too high. I guess I feel more strongly about the same set of issues I am the most conservative on. I also think the economic change is more about whether I clicked "Agree" or "Usually Agree" or some minor differences that will happen every time I take the test.

SKIP

Yelnoc should be up next.

[TJ in Oregon]

Seems like a fairly standard liberal. I probably wouldn't agree with him on much but I'm not aware of anything unusual or "wrong" with his PM score.

[TJ in Oregon]

I liked the old one better but still not horrible.

[TJ in Oregon]

Generic liberal. I'm not a huge fan of it and would have hoped for slightly better (ie. ~S: -2 or -3) considering Snowstalker has said before he wants the Democrats to focus on a working class coalition.

[TJ in Oregon]

Multiply both by negative 1 and I'd be happy. It's hard to judge the test's accuracy for RFK without a more detailed understanding of his positions.

[TJ in Oregon]

I kind of like the social score though I may not so much like the logic behind it. Not a huge fan of the economic one but to me that's of secondary importance.

[TJ in Oregon]

I approve.

[TJ in Oregon]

I liked the previous iteration of his score marginally better, but I still approve.

[TJ in Oregon]

Not bad. I'd prefer 3 or so points higher on both, but a clear A on the Atlas Forum curve

It seems to suit his views pretty well: left-centrist on economics, mildly conservative on social issues.