Would Jesus Christ have banned Rochambeau?

[Antonio the Sixth]

WHO F**KING CARES !!!


There is really nothing else I could answer.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Why is this relevant?

We should all strive to follow Jesus Christ, not man-made rules like of religion. Or the TOS.

LOL, no.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Why is this relevant?

We should all strive to follow Jesus Christ, not man-made rules like of religion. Or the TOS.

LOL, no.

Yes, religion and man-made decrees have done so many good things throughout history after all.

Because Jesus is surely not a religious figure.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Why is this relevant?

We should all strive to follow Jesus Christ, not man-made rules like of religion. Or the TOS.

LOL, no.

Yes, religion and man-made decrees have done so many good things throughout history after all.

Because Jesus is surely not a religious figure.

Jesus sure wasn't popular with religious leaders of the era and it certainly wasn't in tune with what he preached.

When people follow religion they're following some man-made set of rules and obeying the whims of a bunch of self-appointed fallible and flawed leaders. Jesus never said that's the way things she should be. That's part of why I used to be so hateful toward the Catholic Church and probably why people are never Catholic in my subculture. That obviously wasn't right, but neither is trusting in some man-made institution or rules given out by that institution instead of Jesus.

Not an unreasonable position. But there is nothing to suggest what Jesus said wasn't man made either; either by someone else writing on his behalf or even directly from the man himself claiming a divinity to which he wasn't entitled. Men are the makers of gods.

Jesus is most probably a man himself.