Polls on Same-Sex Marriage State Laws
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 04:27:35 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Polls on Same-Sex Marriage State Laws
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 ... 51
Author Topic: Polls on Same-Sex Marriage State Laws  (Read 189310 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #575 on: June 29, 2013, 10:56:58 AM »

Updating the thread map for the new polls from Montana and Ohio and the decision in the Prop 8 case:



For support and legality of same-sex marriage.

White -- same-sex marriage legal or has at the least been enacted. No further distinction.

Green -- same-sex marriage not legal, but more popular than unpopular

65% or higher -- deep green (90% saturation)
60.0 - 64.9%  -- dark green  (70% saturation)
55.0 - 59.9%  -- medium green (50% saturation)
50.0 - 54.6% --  light green (30% saturation)
below 50% but positive -- aqua (20% saturation)

tie -- yellow

above 45.0% but negative -- salmon (30% saturation)
40.0 - 44.9%  -- medium red (50% red)
35.0 - 39.9%  -- maroon (70% red)
under 35% -- deep red  (90% saturation)

Ernest, which polls would you like to add on your map ?

Only polls done in 2013 ?

I have found some polls from other states as well that you can include.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #576 on: June 29, 2013, 11:04:34 AM »
« Edited: June 29, 2013, 11:33:08 AM by Tender Branson »

KY-PPP: 27-65 illegal

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/04/kentucky-miscellany.html

LA-PPP: 29-59 illegal

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/02/louisiana-miscellany.html

TX-PPP: 35-55 illegal

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/01/clinton-could-win-texas.html

WI-PPP: 44-46 illegal

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/02/wisconsin-miscellany.html

KS-PPP: 39-51 illegal

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/02/kansas-miscellany.html

PA-Quinnipiac: 47-43 legal

http://www.politicspa.com/quinnipiac-poll-pa-voters-support-same-sex-marriage-by-a-small-margin/45702

NV (POS): 54-43 legal

http://www.rannv.org/documents/23/Release%20February%2013%20Survey.pdf

...

The last FL poll I can find is from December 2012 from Quinnipiac: 43-45 illegal

http://miamiherald.typepad.com/gaysouthflorida/2012/12/poll-florida-voters-split-on-gay-marriage-oppose-legalizing-pot.html
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #577 on: June 29, 2013, 11:24:52 AM »
« Edited: June 29, 2013, 11:33:38 AM by Tender Branson »

Updating Ernest's map with the above polls:



For support and legality of same-sex marriage.

White -- same-sex marriage legal or has at the least been enacted. No further distinction.

Green -- same-sex marriage not legal, but more popular than unpopular

65% or higher -- deep green (90% saturation)
60.0 - 64.9%  -- dark green  (70% saturation)
55.0 - 59.9%  -- medium green (50% saturation)
50.0 - 54.6% --  light green (30% saturation)
below 50% but positive -- aqua (20% saturation)

tie -- yellow

above 45.0% but negative -- salmon (30% saturation)
40.0 - 44.9%  -- medium red (50% red)
35.0 - 39.9%  -- maroon (70% red)
under 35% -- deep red  (90% saturation)
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #578 on: June 29, 2013, 11:35:35 AM »

I think all the remaining states on the map would all still oppose gay marriage, many of them by huge margins.

Except Hawaii.
Logged
Nhoj
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,224
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.52, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #579 on: June 29, 2013, 11:55:13 AM »

I think all the remaining states on the map would all still oppose gay marriage, many of them by huge margins.

Except Hawaii.
Indiana probably has atleast 40% support and perhaps as much as 45%
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #580 on: June 29, 2013, 11:57:16 AM »
« Edited: June 29, 2013, 12:15:54 PM by True Federalist »

Updating Ernest's map with the above polls:

It was originally pbrower's map, but I modified slightly to allow better coverage of the ranges, and I'm going to do it again to add another band of values for the noes.



For support and legality of same-sex marriage.

White -- same-sex marriage legal or has at the least been enacted. No further distinction.

Green -- same-sex marriage not legal, but more popular than unpopular

65% or higher -- deep green (90% saturation)
60.0 - 64.9%  -- dark green  (70% saturation)
55.0 - 59.9%  -- medium green (50% saturation)
50.0 - 54.6% --  light green (30% saturation)
below 50% but positive -- aqua (20% saturation)

tie -- yellow

above 45.0% but negative -- salmon(30% saturation)
40.0 - 44.9% -- medium red(50% saturation)
35.0 - 39.9%  -- red (60% saturation)
30.0 - 34.9%  -- maroon (70% saturation)
under 30% -- deep red  (90% saturation)
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #581 on: June 29, 2013, 12:16:24 PM »

I think all the remaining states on the map would all still oppose gay marriage, many of them by huge margins.

Except Hawaii.
Indiana probably has atleast 40% support and perhaps as much as 45%

Indeed.

After some googling, I found this poll from December:

45% support
45% oppose

http://www.wishtv.com/dpp/news/indiana/poll-oppostition-to-same-sex-marriage-permanent-ban

...

Which would make IN the first yellow state on the map.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #582 on: June 29, 2013, 12:23:17 PM »

Hawaii was actually 42-50 illegal in a January poll:

http://www.civilbeat.com/articles/2013/01/16/18077-civil-beat-poll-young-people-tipping-the-scales-toward-gay-marriage
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #583 on: June 29, 2013, 12:32:59 PM »

Updated for Hawaii and Indiana



For support and legality of same-sex marriage.

White -- same-sex marriage legal or has at the least been enacted. No further distinction.

Green -- same-sex marriage not legal, but more popular than unpopular

65% or higher -- deep green (90% saturation)
60.0 - 64.9%  -- dark green  (70% saturation)
55.0 - 59.9%  -- medium green (50% saturation)
50.0 - 54.6% --  light green (30% saturation)
below 50% but positive -- aqua (20% saturation)

tie -- yellow

above 45.0% but negative -- salmon(30% saturation)
40.0 - 44.9% -- medium red(50% saturation)
35.0 - 39.9%  -- red (60% saturation)
30.0 - 34.9%  -- maroon (70% saturation)
under 30% -- deep red  (90% saturation)
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #584 on: June 29, 2013, 12:35:03 PM »

There are some polls from 2011 to Mid-2012 from states like WV, MO, UT and so on.

Should we include those on the map or not ?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #585 on: June 29, 2013, 12:41:56 PM »
« Edited: June 29, 2013, 01:04:00 PM by True Federalist »

I'd prefer to not go more than a year back considering how the situation is fluid:

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_MO_060112.pdf MO 36-52 June 2012

http://www.omaha.com/article/20121004/NEWS/710049903  NE 32-61 Oct 2012

Updated for Nebraska and Missouri above and Arkansas in the post below.



For support and legality of same-sex marriage.

White -- same-sex marriage legal or has at the least been enacted. No further distinction.

Green -- same-sex marriage not legal, but more popular than unpopular

65% or higher -- deep green (90% saturation)
60.0 - 64.9%  -- dark green  (70% saturation)
55.0 - 59.9%  -- medium green (50% saturation)
50.0 - 54.6% --  light green (30% saturation)
below 50% but positive -- aqua (20% saturation)

tie -- yellow

above 45.0% but negative -- salmon(30% saturation)
40.0 - 44.9% -- medium red(50% saturation)
35.0 - 39.9%  -- red (60% saturation)
30.0 - 34.9%  -- maroon (70% saturation)
under 30% -- deep red  (90% saturation)
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #586 on: June 29, 2013, 12:55:58 PM »

AR was 18-75 in Oct. 2012

http://plsc.uark.edu/partners/arkpoll/12/2012_Arkansas_Poll_Summary_Report.pdf
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #587 on: July 02, 2013, 03:40:35 PM »
« Edited: July 11, 2013, 05:01:46 PM by pbrower2a »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I endorse the change in the color choices.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #588 on: July 02, 2013, 03:48:48 PM »
« Edited: July 03, 2013, 11:54:44 AM by pbrower2a »

I'd prefer to not go more than a year back considering how the situation is fluid:

The 2012 election is as far back as we need go.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_MO_060112.pdf MO 36-52 June 2012

http://www.omaha.com/article/20121004/NEWS/710049903  NE 32-61 Oct 2012

Updated for Nebraska and Missouri above and Arkansas in the post below.

I'm not saying that the polls for Missouri or Nebraska are inaccurate, but the 2012 election is as far back as we dare go. Same-sex marriage was basically shelved during the 2012 election. Afterwards -- Indiana polls are rare enough that I would go back to December of last year.   



For support and legality of same-sex marriage.

White -- same-sex marriage legal or has at the least been enacted. No further distinction.

Green -- same-sex marriage not legal, but more popular than unpopular

65% or higher -- deep green (90% saturation)
60.0 - 64.9%  -- dark green  (70% saturation)
55.0 - 59.9%  -- medium green (50% saturation)
50.0 - 54.6% --  light green (30% saturation)
below 50% but positive -- aqua (20% saturation)

tie -- yellow

above 45.0% but negative -- salmon(30% saturation)
40.0 - 44.9% -- medium red(50% saturation)
35.0 - 39.9%  -- red (60% saturation)
30.0 - 34.9%  -- maroon (70% saturation)
under 30% -- deep red  (90% saturation)
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #589 on: July 03, 2013, 11:57:10 AM »

Texas, PPP:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/07/texas-miscellany.html



For support and legality of same-sex marriage.

White -- same-sex marriage legal or has at the least been enacted. No further distinction.

Green -- same-sex marriage not legal, but more popular than unpopular

65% or higher -- deep green (90% saturation)
60.0 - 64.9%  -- dark green  (70% saturation)
55.0 - 59.9%  -- medium green (50% saturation)
50.0 - 54.6% --  light green (30% saturation)
below 50% but positive -- aqua (20% saturation)

tie -- yellow

above 45.0% but negative -- salmon(30% saturation)
40.0 - 44.9% -- medium red(50% saturation)
35.0 - 39.9%  -- red (60% saturation)
30.0 - 34.9%  -- maroon (70% saturation)
under 30% -- deep red  (90% saturation)

Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #590 on: July 03, 2013, 12:20:10 PM »

It looks like the South is not "evolving" yet.

Except FL and VA ...
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #591 on: July 03, 2013, 12:21:32 PM »



...how can they look at those numbers and think that a 2014 initiative is a good idea?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #592 on: July 03, 2013, 01:22:48 PM »


They may think that it would be likelier to help bring progressive voters to the ballot box than conservative voters, which even if it goes to defeat would still be a positive for them in other races.  Personally, I think that won't be the case, but it would be a logical reason to attempt a referendum you knew was going to lose.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #593 on: July 03, 2013, 01:24:16 PM »

It looks like the South is not "evolving" yet.

Except FL and VA ...

It's not the South that is resisting evolving, it's the Bible Belt that's resisting, and most of the population of Virginia and Florida are outside the Belt.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,748
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #594 on: July 03, 2013, 04:22:37 PM »


When you live in a state like Arkansas, the only option you have is to try and try again. There will be no help from the legislature, governor or top court, so you have to be the one to help yourself.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #595 on: July 04, 2013, 03:48:23 AM »


When you live in a state like Arkansas, the only option you have is to try and try again. There will be no help from the legislature, governor or top court, so you have to be the one to help yourself.

Having the debate will help move the numbers toward the right side. It certainly can't make things worse there, can it?
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #596 on: July 10, 2013, 10:45:17 AM »

IA (PPP):

47-44 legal

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_Iowa_710.pdf
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,316
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #597 on: July 10, 2013, 11:15:04 PM »


See sole comment in linked article about piss-poor wording of polled question. Unreliable poll IMO.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,316
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #598 on: July 10, 2013, 11:35:44 PM »


When oh when will people realize that in most states civil unions are the way to go? They'll pass in all but a handful of states, but would pass in scads of states where gay marriage can't for many years. Furthermore, it'll speed up gay marriage in those states by overcoming the conservatives fear of the unknown.

The issue isn't whether a second rate form of marriage should be accepted. Its whether to accept civil unions and gay marriage in 5-10 years, or no marital rights whatsoever and gay marriage in 20-30 years (maybe).
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #599 on: July 10, 2013, 11:50:03 PM »


When oh when will people realize that in most states civil unions are the way to go? They'll pass in all but a handful of states, but would pass in scads of states where gay marriage can't for many years. Furthermore, it'll speed up gay marriage in those states by overcoming the conservatives fear of the unknown.

The issue isn't whether a second rate form of marriage should be accepted. Its whether to accept civil unions and gay marriage in 5-10 years, or no marital rights whatsoever and gay marriage in 20-30 years (maybe).

Except Republican legislatures won't pass civil unions/domestic partnerships, and past elections have shown that people who support civil unions in polls will vote against them when given the option.

"I'm fine with gays getting some recognition, but if it's my decision I'll vote NO."
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 ... 51  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.138 seconds with 13 queries.