Polls on Same-Sex Marriage State Laws

[CaDan]

Comparing Proposition 22 and Proposition 8 is laughable.

Proposition 8 was a Constitutional Amendment, Proposition 22 was not. The two propositions were worded differently as well.

Apples and oranges.

Oh and "social 'science'" is not a science at all.

[CaDan]

Carl already pointed that polling on this issue is misleading.

1. Polling companies routinely "cook the books" either deliberately or through the way in which they word their questions.

2. Individuals often do not give accurate information to pollsters.

3. There is a marked difference between the national polls on this issue, and individual State polls. If the national polls like the Gallup garbage are correct, then Pennsylvania shouldn't have a 20+ point gap against homosexual 'marriage'.

So either Gallup is wrong, PPP is wrong, or something else is going on.

4. Polling companies changed the wording of the way that they asked the question. This means that any polls before/after that change cannot be compared.

5. A recent national poll using different wording found 62% opposition to changing the definition of marriage. (This would be more in line with the 20 point gap found in Pennsylvania).

[CaDan]

Pennsylvania is a swing state with a left lean. Hence, if the national polls indicated a 53%-44% split in favor of redefining marriage, Pennsylvania should be somewhat close to that number, not 20 points in the opposite direction.

When you consider the other PPP polls (OH, MI, MN, ect...) you don't get numbers IN SWING STATES which would support what the Gallup polls are showing.

When you add in the numbers in places like MARYLAND (about as far left as you can get) then something is wrong with the way Gallup is conducting the poll.

[CaDan]

Oh, and changing ONE WORD in a polling question can drastically change the results.

Hence, social "science" is not science at all.

Self-reporting surveys are inherently flawed, especially on hot button issues in the face of propaganda and violence from those pushing an agenda on the issue. (White powder sent to mormon temples, assaults, death threats, boycotts, fines, ect...)

[CaDan]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Fail.

Baker v. Nelson recognized the procreative nature of marriage, and like it or not, Baker v. Nelson is the LAW OF THE LAND. (Dismissal for want of a substantial federal question constitutes a decision on the merits, which binds lower courts on the issues presented in the jurisdictional statement.)

Second, other decisions such as Anderson v. King County and Hernandez v. Robles recognized the procreative nature of marriage as a legitimate reason for ensuring that it was not redefined by homosexuals.

Your assertion is a lie.

[CaDan]

Those NM numbers from Putrid Propaganda Polling only were achieved after PPP deliberately stacked the poll to get the numbers that they wanted.

Of course, the lefties here don't care about that reality.

[CaDan]

LOL!!!

Push poll commissioned by homosexual activists. Even the far-left Post says its the "rosiest" picture yet, as normal polls have this 50-50.

OF COURSE ITS ROSY! It's a push poll.

Got to love that spin. Goes to show that PPP is nothing more than a propaganda outfit.