Choose between the following...

[tpfkaw]

I think I know how this one will turn out.

[Del Tachi]

While the first option is ridiculous, the second option is even more so. 

[Antonio the Sixth]

Making us choose between Completely Retarded Idea and Batsh*t Insanely Pathetically Stupid Idea So Absurd That Even A Mentally Challenged 2-Years Old Kid Will Find It Retarded won't give Completely Retarded Idea more credibility, you know.

[Mechaman]

Abolish all taxation and let the wonders of Darwinism take full tuition.

Human morality be damned.

[Verily]

On that choice, abolish all taxation and use tariffs.

[tpfkaw]

On that choice, abolish all taxation and use tariffs.

A tariff is by definition a tax.

However, lotteries and other non-mandatory user fees for state-owned industries could exist.

[Snowstalker Mk. II]

So either choice destroys our nation. I chose #2.

[opebo]

Obviously the first choice is the only one which would at least lead to some form of survival.  But naturally I would also deny all government services including police protection from those over 200K.

[Marokai Backbeat]

This is an incredibly dumb choice.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

This is an incredibly dumb choice.

This is a wormyguy poll.

[opebo]

This is an incredibly dumb choice.

wormy guy is the one that was complaining about boiling missionaries, if I'm not mistaken.

[TheGlobalizer]

Abolish all taxation and let the wonders of Darwinism take full tuition.

Human morality be damned.

[Insula Dei]

I'm sure there is a cunning plan to demonstrate our unlibertarian foolishness here, we just don't see it.

[stegosaurus]

Option 1, which is the most sensible of two utterly silly ideas.

[courts]

On that choice, abolish all taxation and use tariffs.

A tariff is by definition a tax.

However, lotteries and other non-mandatory user fees for state-owned industries could exist.

What's the moral distinction between people being arrested, forcibly removed or even killed (potentially, if every other option has been exhausted as you're fond of pointing out) for not paying for a service like toll roads.. And the status quo of involuntary taxation? I'm not really seeing much of one especially when you're dependent on that service either way.

[tpfkaw]

On that choice, abolish all taxation and use tariffs.

A tariff is by definition a tax.

However, lotteries and other non-mandatory user fees for state-owned industries could exist.

What's the moral distinction between people being arrested, forcibly removed or even killed for not paying for a service like toll roads.. And the status quo of involuntary taxation? I'm not really seeing much of one.

Well, obviously that's almost or even equally as wrong, it's just not *technically* "taxation," per se.

[Sbane]

Obviously the first choice is the only one which would at least lead to some form of survival.  But naturally I would also deny all government services including police protection from those over 200K.

Opebo has it right on this one. Choose the first option and then let the poors take from the rich by force.

Obviously this is a ridiculous ass poll. When is Wormyguy scheduled to be banned again?

[Verily]

On that choice, abolish all taxation and use tariffs.

A tariff is by definition a tax.

However, lotteries and other non-mandatory user fees for state-owned industries could exist.

If that's your distinction, tariffs are also voluntary. You aren't required to import goods; you could produce them domestically.