2012 NDP leadership convention
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 02:20:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  2012 NDP leadership convention
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 ... 61
Author Topic: 2012 NDP leadership convention  (Read 144552 times)
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,747
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1300 on: March 24, 2012, 11:33:42 AM »

Topp said he would endorse Nash if he were to drop, hopes she would endorse him. Cullen is highly predicted to support Mulcair if he's out.

Looks like it's Mulcair/Cullen versus Nash/Topp, but no one knows what Nash wants, really.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1301 on: March 24, 2012, 11:43:12 AM »

Topp said he would endorse Nash if he were to drop, hopes she would endorse him. Cullen is highly predicted to support Mulcair if he's out.

Looks like it's Mulcair/Cullen versus Nash/Topp, but no one knows what Nash wants, really.

Pat Martin thinks Cullen could surpass Topp on the next ballot. IMO if Mulcair doesn't break 40 on the next ballot he's in trouble.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,406
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1302 on: March 24, 2012, 11:54:42 AM »

What a bunch of incompetent nincompoops.
Logged
hawkeye59
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,530
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1303 on: March 24, 2012, 11:58:19 AM »

Any info on the candidates, because I don't know much about them. Cullen seems good, though.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,747
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1304 on: March 24, 2012, 12:48:17 PM »

Second ballot

Nash 10519 16.8%
Cullen 12449 19.9%
Topp 15624 25%
Mulcair 23902 38.8%
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,406
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1305 on: March 24, 2012, 12:48:58 PM »

Mulcair 38.3
Topp 25
Cullen 19.9
Nash 16.8

Nash eliminated, Cullen's performance is underwhelming, Mulcair faces some pretty stiff resistance. Go Topp!
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1306 on: March 24, 2012, 12:50:02 PM »

Mulcair 38.3
Topp 25
Cullen 19.9
Nash 16.8

Nash eliminated, Cullen's performance is underwhelming, Mulcair faces some pretty stiff resistance. Go Topp!

If Cullen throws in with Mulcair, game over.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,747
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1307 on: March 24, 2012, 12:50:21 PM »

I think nearly 39% is a very good result for Mulcair in the second round.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1308 on: March 24, 2012, 12:53:04 PM »

I think nearly 39% is a very good result for Mulcair in the second round.

Nash released her delegates, which is probably good news for Mulcair.
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,624
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1309 on: March 24, 2012, 01:02:05 PM »
« Edited: March 24, 2012, 01:05:50 PM by Chemistry & Sleep Deprivation »

I notice than Mulcair gained 4200 votes, while all other candidates gained roughly 2000 each. Mulcair isn't doing badly in second choices, then.

I'm pretty sure than Mulcair wins. The only case I can see him losing is if Cullen manages to get over Topp on next count, because Cullen is more consentual than both Mulcair and Topp.

Topp is the candidate who gained the least votes in the 2rd round, it means something.
Logged
hawkeye59
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,530
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1310 on: March 24, 2012, 01:05:28 PM »

Any info on the candidates, because I don't know much about them. Cullen seems good, though.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,664
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1311 on: March 24, 2012, 01:20:41 PM »

This post...

On the other hand, even though it's pretty unlikely, I'll admit it wouldn't completely shock me if Topp were stronger than the forum thinks. If we hadn't had any real polls and only had the internet (which is basically our situation now), we would have thought that Hillary Clinton had only "establishment" and no "grassroots" support too...

...seems rather prescient.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1312 on: March 24, 2012, 02:15:26 PM »

Any info on the candidates, because I don't know much about them. Cullen seems good, though.

In terms of ideology, there's not any real difference.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1313 on: March 24, 2012, 02:20:02 PM »

Any info on the candidates, because I don't know much about them. Cullen seems good, though.

In terms of ideology, there's not any real difference.

Everyone to the left of Mulcair/Cullen is a matter of degree IMO. Even Mulcair has cap and trade "carbon pricing" in his platform, though he doesn't talk about it.
Logged
hawkeye59
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,530
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1314 on: March 24, 2012, 02:29:56 PM »

So Topp's the most left-wing? I would think that Cullen would be. But it looks like Mulcair will win. Mulcair just doesn't seem good at all. Plus, the NDP can't just be a Quebec party.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1315 on: March 24, 2012, 02:36:08 PM »

So Topp's the most left-wing? I would think that Cullen would be. But it looks like Mulcair will win. Mulcair just doesn't seem good at all. Plus, the NDP can't just be a Quebec party.

Of the remaining candidates, yes.
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,351


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1316 on: March 24, 2012, 02:41:10 PM »

So Topp's the most left-wing? I would think that Cullen would be. But it looks like Mulcair will win. Mulcair just doesn't seem good at all. Plus, the NDP can't just be a Quebec party.

It also can't just be a non-Quebec party if it is to have any chance of winning anything.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1317 on: March 24, 2012, 02:48:36 PM »

Obviously, Mulcair not winning would be deeply problematic.
Logged
hawkeye59
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,530
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1318 on: March 24, 2012, 02:52:02 PM »

I guess, but I do like Cullen's idea about the Lib-NDP-Green candidate in Conservative ridings.
Logged
hawkeye59
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,530
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1319 on: March 24, 2012, 02:59:14 PM »
« Edited: March 24, 2012, 03:01:21 PM by hawkeye59 »

Obviously, Mulcair not winning would be deeply problematic.
Why would Mulcair be better than Topp or Cullen? Also, is Mulcair the most like Layton? Because that would be a good sign.
Logged
Peter the Lefty
Peternerdman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,506
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1320 on: March 24, 2012, 03:01:00 PM »

As someone with no knowledge whatsoever of how such things work, I have a question about Cullen's proposal:
Would the party itself have to hold a vote on whether or not to allow his idea to go through, if he wins this?  Because I doubt they'd actually approve of it, so if that were the case, then I'll be rooting for Cullen from here on out.  
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1321 on: March 24, 2012, 03:01:10 PM »

3rd ballot voting extended to 5:40 PM Eastern.
Logged
hawkeye59
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,530
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1322 on: March 24, 2012, 03:02:38 PM »

3rd ballot voting extended to 5:40 PM Eastern.
Wow, the NDP has been completely failing today.
Logged
Peter the Lefty
Peternerdman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,506
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1323 on: March 24, 2012, 03:06:53 PM »

I hope Nash supporters are smart and jump ship to Cullen, because he'd have a better shot of betting Mulcair (except among Quebec members).  Not to mention, he'd be the only other candidate who could viably become Prime Minister.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1324 on: March 24, 2012, 03:08:04 PM »

Mixed signals depending on who you talk to, but I'd expect Nash supporters would go to Topp, which means Mulcair wins. The last ABM window requires Cullen surpassing Topp.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 ... 61  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 12 queries.