SENATE BILL: Transportation Infrastructure Investment Act (Law'd)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 05:36:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: Transportation Infrastructure Investment Act (Law'd)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: Transportation Infrastructure Investment Act (Law'd)  (Read 6178 times)
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 30, 2011, 05:52:25 PM »
« edited: September 22, 2011, 12:02:38 AM by Senator North Carolina Yankee »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor: Napoleon
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2011, 05:54:38 PM »

Also considering a Texas line. Thoughts?
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 30, 2011, 06:01:48 PM »

Considering the population concentration in TX, and the economic growth, it would probably be wise.



We need to make sure none of these would duplicate a previous created line, if such hasn't been done already, unless traffic justifies a second line.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2011, 06:03:52 PM »

Didn't we pass a high speed rail bill a year ago, which covered a bunch of cities?
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 30, 2011, 06:08:26 PM »

You might be thinking of the High Speed Rail Act referenced in this bill, unless I missed something on the Wiki.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,019


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 30, 2011, 06:10:47 PM »

Didn't we pass a high speed rail bill a year ago, which covered a bunch of cities?

I think I had some provisions in my bill a while ago, but I could be wrong. It may have been expansion of the highway system. I think bgwah had a similar bill as well. I favor a bill like this as long as it isn't redundant. I know Texas has not been covered, but I believe some of the major southern hubs were. Again, I could be wrong.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,663
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 30, 2011, 11:53:50 PM »

I'm skeptical of this. These rail projects tend to cost way more than their budget, and can't create demand.  These areas already have commuter/regional rail service, just a bit slower. What we should be looking at is funding some reliable public transit in places that don't have it already.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 31, 2011, 11:57:32 PM »

I support this utterly... we need to start looking at nation-building projects.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,019


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 01, 2011, 11:38:12 AM »

I support this utterly... we need to start looking at nation-building projects.

I agree. My point is merely making sure we aren't repeating projects already in progress.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,663
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 01, 2011, 12:35:44 PM »

None of these routes are inter-regional. If a region wants high speed rail, why not just let them do it? That would prevent us from doing several projects at once that may or may not be important to the people that live there.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,019


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 01, 2011, 02:19:14 PM »

None of these routes are inter-regional. If a region wants high speed rail, why not just let them do it? That would prevent us from doing several projects at once that may or may not be important to the people that live there.

Something I would favor would be to designate X number of dollars to the regional governments with provisions for use on mass transit projects. The only problem with this would be whether some reasons would have the capacity to build out these projects without capital from the federal government. I would assume my home region would not, but I'll let the Emperor speak for himself.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 01, 2011, 02:39:04 PM »

I'm skeptical of this. These rail projects tend to cost way more than their budget, and can't create demand.  These areas already have commuter/regional rail service, just a bit slower. What we should be looking at is funding some reliable public transit in places that don't have it already.

It is possible that the regions will have to cover some costs.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 01, 2011, 02:44:27 PM »
« Edited: September 01, 2011, 02:49:56 PM by Senator Fuzzleton »

Could we get a Minneapolis-Madison-Milwaukee-Chicago-Des Moines-Omaha-St. Louis-KC line as well?
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,019


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 01, 2011, 02:49:38 PM »
« Edited: September 01, 2011, 02:51:40 PM by Senator Duke »

I agree with shua in part on this bill. I think outside of building these facilities, we need to give people incentives to use them. As it stands, it is cheaper to fly from NY to Washington than it is to take a high speed train. How will demand for these rail systems be such that they will make financial sense in the future? Especially obscure lines in the midwest, where mass transit is very sparse outside of Chicago and a few other places? We could conceivable build these and watch them be money losers for a long, long time.

How do we create demand for these things? I don't know.

Don't get me wrong though. I have been a big proponent of rail systems in the past, authored a bill and voted for these as well. I just do not want to saturate the market for them, because it still is small at the moment outside of anywhere but the Northeast. Perhaps "if we build them, they will come" rings true here, but I think we should tread cautiously before dumping billions into the project in places like Iowa and Nebraska.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 01, 2011, 02:52:31 PM »
« Edited: September 01, 2011, 03:09:13 PM by Senator Fuzzleton »

I agree with shua in part on this bill. I think outside of building these facilities, we need to give people incentives to use them. As it stands, it is cheaper to fly from NY to Washington than it is to take a high speed train. How will demand for these rail systems be such that they will make financial sense in the future? Especially obscure lines in the midwest, where mass transit is very sparse outside of Chicago and a few other places? We could conceivable build these and watch them be money losers for a long, long time.

How do we create demand for these things? I don't know.

People won't have to put up with full body searches if they take Atrack.  Wink

The line wouldn't be to get people to Des Moines and Omaha (although they are very nice cities Wink ), it would be more to get folks from those cities to Chicago, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Chicago and Milwaukee.  Those cities actually have a tourism draw, so that's why I propose adding a handful of medium cities to the lines. 
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 03, 2011, 05:19:26 PM »

Didn't we pass a high speed rail bill a year ago, which covered a bunch of cities?

I think I had some provisions in my bill a while ago, but I could be wrong. It may have been expansion of the highway system. I think bgwah had a similar bill as well. I favor a bill like this as long as it isn't redundant. I know Texas has not been covered, but I believe some of the major southern hubs were. Again, I could be wrong.

perhaps you're thinking of what was included in the stimulus: https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/2010_Federal_Stimulus_Act
Logged
Ban my account ffs!
snowguy716
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,632
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 03, 2011, 06:13:06 PM »

I am skeptical of rail transit in all but the largest cities since busses can do the job much more cost effectively.  They also respond to increases or decreases in demand much more quickly.  With hybrid busses and even electric ones, I think they make the best solution for most cities up to the large metro areas.

Interregional high speed rail makes sense.  They are precisely what carries water for local and slower regional mass transit since they tend to be profitable even when taking capital costs into account.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 04, 2011, 09:48:52 PM »

Any amendments? Further debate?
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 04, 2011, 10:54:10 PM »

Ill have an amendment by tomorrow.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: September 04, 2011, 11:03:48 PM »

I would like to amend the appropriations to include the following:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: September 04, 2011, 11:29:13 PM »

I am skeptical of rail transit in all but the largest cities since busses can do the job much more cost effectively.  They also respond to increases or decreases in demand much more quickly.  With hybrid busses and even electric ones, I think they make the best solution for most cities up to the large metro areas.

Interregional high speed rail makes sense.  They are precisely what carries water for local and slower regional mass transit since they tend to be profitable even when taking capital costs into account.

It's a trade-off, rail in large cities is more expensive and requires additional land corridors or excavation - but buses are large, awkward and do take up room on the roads.

I generally prefer rail, light-rail or BRT (bus rapid transit) to ordinary buses.

I think inter-regional lines make the most sense.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: September 04, 2011, 11:29:41 PM »
« Edited: September 04, 2011, 11:36:07 PM by Senator North Carolina Yankee »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.


Sponsor Feedback: Invalid Entry
Status: Awaiting Sponsor feedback
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: September 05, 2011, 04:27:51 AM »

Friendly
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: September 05, 2011, 05:08:54 AM »



Cheesy
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: September 05, 2011, 04:33:20 PM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.


Sponsor Feedback: Friendly
Status: Senators have 24 hours to object to passage of the amendment
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 12 queries.