SENATE BILL: Transportation Infrastructure Investment Act (Law'd) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:32:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: Transportation Infrastructure Investment Act (Law'd) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: Transportation Infrastructure Investment Act (Law'd)  (Read 6261 times)
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

« on: August 31, 2011, 11:57:32 PM »

I support this utterly... we need to start looking at nation-building projects.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2011, 11:29:13 PM »

I am skeptical of rail transit in all but the largest cities since busses can do the job much more cost effectively.  They also respond to increases or decreases in demand much more quickly.  With hybrid busses and even electric ones, I think they make the best solution for most cities up to the large metro areas.

Interregional high speed rail makes sense.  They are precisely what carries water for local and slower regional mass transit since they tend to be profitable even when taking capital costs into account.

It's a trade-off, rail in large cities is more expensive and requires additional land corridors or excavation - but buses are large, awkward and do take up room on the roads.

I generally prefer rail, light-rail or BRT (bus rapid transit) to ordinary buses.

I think inter-regional lines make the most sense.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2011, 01:12:36 AM »

I think the amendment passes.

I propose

5. $8 billion will be distributed among the regions by the DoIA for the repair, expansion, or construction of rapid bus lines in metropolitan areas.

It's a good idea.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

« Reply #3 on: September 11, 2011, 07:51:12 PM »

Consider that one of the key issues for rail in many parts of the country is the rails themselves are owned privately, and more often that not freight, which generates more revenue, is given priority access to the best tracks - which means passenger services get old tracks that cannot handle maximum train speeds.

So even when trains COULD go 100-130mph, they are slowed down to as little as 40mph...

This issue is BIGGER than just throwing money at it... it needs a equally-sized discussion.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.