Ontario 2011 (6th October) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 02:57:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Ontario 2011 (6th October) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Ontario 2011 (6th October)  (Read 83145 times)
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,733
« on: September 08, 2011, 09:06:03 PM »

True, Thornhill is nowhere near a Suburban target but hey, who thunk Bramalea-Gore-Malton would be.

On demographic grounds, B-G-M was more plausible--not unlike the BCNDP's suburban strongholds.  And for whatever reason, Thornhill's long been the rimshot bottom of the barrel among Ontario NDP prospects--if they were to target it, they'd need an Erin Shapero or something.
Logged
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,733
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2011, 07:06:09 AM »

Anyone notice that (momentarily, at least) the 2007 poll-by-polls and poll maps on the Elections Ontario site are down?
Logged
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,733
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2011, 08:13:05 PM »

Well, it's a more "normal" figure than that 40-29 "did they get the parties reversed?!?" poll.  (And IIRC, did some polls put John Tory similarly close-behind at a similar stage of the 2007 campaign?)
Logged
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,733
« Reply #3 on: September 23, 2011, 08:02:45 PM »

So the only way a Liberal-NDP accord can work is if the Liberals come ahead in terms of seats.

Or at least, if the seat totals were close enough--the Liberals had 48 to the PCs' 52 in '85, although being ahead in the actual vote totals gave the Grits an added gloss of "moral authority".
Logged
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,733
« Reply #4 on: September 24, 2011, 04:43:48 PM »

I'm concerned. How can a 6 point gain only result in 3 more seats. (The article says the NDP is down in Parkdale-High Park, yeah right!).

I'm suspicious of P-HP, too.  However, an only-3-seat pickup *could* be plausible if the gains are largely "bottom-feeding" in little-or-no-hope seats.  (Sort of like 2003, where the NDP lost official party status while gaining share, thanks to dead cat bounces in the 905 and wherever else.)
Logged
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,733
« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2011, 07:15:08 PM »
« Edited: September 27, 2011, 07:17:25 PM by adma »

Keep in mind that McGuinty's always been a mediocre debate performer.  (Which in some paradoxical way, might serve his "stay the course" tone well--i.e. better honest mediocrity than overperformance.)

For some reason, Horwath reminded me of a stockier Jennifer Aniston.
Logged
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,733
« Reply #6 on: September 30, 2011, 06:42:03 AM »

I think that the earlier poll was simply wrong in those particular ridings. That mega poll by Forum had the Tories and Liberals at 35% each and the NDP at 23% - that represents a 7 point drop for the Liberals since 2007 and a 6 point gain for the NDP - it is simply not believable that the NDP could be losing or be anywhere near close to losing seats they won comfortably in 2007 when they the same poll shows a 13 point Liberal to NDP swing!

Unless we were seeing some mystery comeback for the federal urban-yuppie strategy of "vote strategically: vote Liberal".  Like, being rid of Gerard Kennedy, Maria Minna, etc gives the Grits an alibi to re-plant that seed provincially...
Logged
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,733
« Reply #7 on: October 07, 2011, 08:44:23 PM »

From glimpsing results, it seems to me like the Libertarians fared better (well, in numbers of 1%+ candidates) than they have for over 20 years--dunno whether it's a "Ron Paul" effect...
Logged
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,733
« Reply #8 on: October 08, 2011, 03:15:16 PM »


Markham, Vaughan, Richmond Hill, King City, Whitchurck-Stoufville
Lib - 48.04%
PC - 37.36%
NDP - 10.12%
Grn - 2.43%
Ltn - 1.46%
FP - 0.07%
Oth - 0.53%


That NDP figure seems low. There weren't *that* many under-10% up there, were there?
Logged
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,733
« Reply #9 on: October 16, 2011, 11:51:17 AM »

Remember: what ought to make even less sense than the Greens in Duff-Cal are (at least until this year's elections) the Greens in Grey-Bruce-OS...
Logged
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,733
« Reply #10 on: October 20, 2011, 07:32:02 PM »

When it comes to making sense of these Ontario Green voting patterns, it's useful to keep in mind the "Tories with composters" label that's been attached to them...
Logged
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,733
« Reply #11 on: March 26, 2013, 08:04:35 PM »

Bad news, people--the colour-coded poll-by-poll maps on the Global TV site have been 404'd for the past couple of days http://globalnews.ca/pages/topicNew.aspx?id=6442556629
Logged
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,733
« Reply #12 on: March 27, 2013, 06:39:22 PM »

And unfortunately, the structure of the Global site is such that I haven't figured out how, exactly, to inquire about what's going on (I tried, reflexively, through a programming-feedback page; no word yet)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 12 queries.