KY-PPP: Close presidential race among likely 2011 voters
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 01:55:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  KY-PPP: Close presidential race among likely 2011 voters
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: KY-PPP: Close presidential race among likely 2011 voters  (Read 3385 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 02, 2011, 03:07:16 PM »

IMPORTANT NOTE:

"Poll respondents—likely voters in this fall’s gubernatorial election—report having voted for McCain over Obama by only four points, when he actually won by 16.  In that sense, Romney and Perry actually improve on McCain’s victory margin, despite their raw single-digit leads.  But Obama would outperform his 2008 pace in the state against the others, something we're finding in nearly every state.  This is the first state since we started polling Perry in the general election matchups a few weeks ago in which he has almost matched Romney's standing against the president.

In the end, Obama won't win Kentucky--not even close.  Republican voters don't seem too jazzed up by David Williams, so Democrats might have a good year this fall.  But conservatives will be back out in force next year, and Kentucky won't be near the top of any candidate's travel itinerary."



http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_KY_0902.pdf

Obama vs. Romney

Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 02, 2011, 03:17:07 PM »

Basically you should ignore this KY poll and the WV poll of next week, because Democrats are much more likely to turn out this fall then next year.

Therefore the results of these "likely 2011 voter" polls are distorting the real turnout of 2012.

You need to add about 12 points to each margin and you roughly have the current poll margin, using 2008 turnout.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 02, 2011, 03:22:16 PM »

So much also to the claim by Bandit that KY would be close with Rick Perry.

The race would only be close if Obama and Perry would run for KY attorney general this year ... Wink
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 02, 2011, 03:24:35 PM »

It's clear these numbers aren't realistic... but I don't think you have to add 12 points for the GOP nominee... many Beshear democratic voters are going to vote republican next year no matter what.
And I think Obama could beat Palin there. But she won't be the nominee, so Kentucky is SAFE GOP
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 02, 2011, 04:03:41 PM »

A quick re-weight of these PPP crosstabs to 2008 and 2004 KY exit poll turnout:

51-37 Romney vs. Obama (2008)
53-35 Romney vs. Obama (2004)

52-38 Perry vs. Obama (2008)
53-36 Perry vs. Obama (2004)

49-40 Bachmann vs. Obama (2008)
50-38 Bachmann vs. Obama (2004)

46-44 Palin vs. Obama (2008)
48-43 Palin vs. Obama (2004)
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 02, 2011, 04:07:51 PM »

This kind of puts the kibosh on the GOP's wet dream of Perry automatically winning Kentucky.
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,637
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 02, 2011, 05:02:54 PM »
« Edited: September 02, 2011, 05:04:40 PM by ShadowOfTheWave »

This kind of puts the kibosh on the GOP's wet dream of Perry automatically winning Kentucky.

No it doesn't.

However, it's interesting that Obama is doing this well when he's doing so poorly nationwide. KY still has a reasonably strong Democratic base.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 02, 2011, 05:06:48 PM »


Actually it does. This poll vastly oversampled Republicans.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 02, 2011, 05:07:46 PM »

IMPORTANT NOTE:

"Poll respondents—likely voters in this fall’s gubernatorial election—report having voted for McCain over Obama by only four points, when he actually won by 16.  In that sense, Romney and Perry actually improve on McCain’s victory margin, despite their raw single-digit leads.  But Obama would outperform his 2008 pace in the state against the others, something we're finding in nearly every state.  This is the first state since we started polling Perry in the general election matchups a few weeks ago in which he has almost matched Romney's standing against the president.

In the end, Obama won't win Kentucky--not even close.  Republican voters don't seem too jazzed up by David Williams, so Democrats might have a good year this fall.  But conservatives will be back out in force next year, and Kentucky won't be near the top of any candidate's travel itinerary."



http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_KY_0902.pdf

Obama vs. Romney



Obama vs. Bachmann






Obama vs. Palin



Obama vs. Perry

Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 02, 2011, 05:51:06 PM »

I think you should give Bachmann a tie with Obama.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,145
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 02, 2011, 06:09:23 PM »

It's all about swing, if Obama is holding close to his 2008 numbers in states like this, it means that the uniform swing isn't shifting a whole lot. In more competitive states, polling is showing him holding narrow leads, which is further indication of the uniform swing not shifting heavily yet.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 02, 2011, 08:43:46 PM »

I wonder how Kentucky will vote after the Republicans get rid of their Medicare and Social Security.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 02, 2011, 08:51:11 PM »

Kentucky is one of those states which could swing to Obama in 2012 even if it's close, given less of a PUMA factor.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 02, 2011, 08:52:08 PM »

There was no PUMA factor.......
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 02, 2011, 08:53:19 PM »

It's a shame Palin isn't going to be the nominee.  I would love to see that campaign.  She'd only go down from here.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,075


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 02, 2011, 08:56:15 PM »

Palin won't even run. She'd completely destroy herself if she actually jumped into the race, and she knows it.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 02, 2011, 08:58:30 PM »


I mean by Democrats in the South who only voted for McCain because they were pissed about Clinton losing (and also because he's black)
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 02, 2011, 09:19:00 PM »


I mean by Democrats in the South who only voted for McCain because they were pissed about Clinton losing (and also because he's black)

And I don't think they were a factor. Some of it had to do with the fact that he was black, and also that he was exotic and not a real Muhrican.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 02, 2011, 09:44:04 PM »


I mean by Democrats in the South who only voted for McCain because they were pissed about Clinton losing (and also because he's black)

And I don't think they were a factor. Some of it had to do with the fact that he was black, and also that he was exotic and not a real Muhrican.

Looking at exit polls, there certainly seem to be a number of voters who would have voted for Hillary but not Obama, even though they voted for Kerry.
Logged
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: September 02, 2011, 09:55:52 PM »

Kentucky is one of those states which could swing to Obama in 2012 even if it's close, given less of a PUMA factor.

Do you mean swing as in "Obama loses by a lesser margin" or "Obama wins"? If it's the latter, lol.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: September 02, 2011, 09:57:47 PM »

Certainly not the latter, just maybe gaining a couple %. Especially in Eastern Kentucky, where he lost counties that literally have never voted Republican.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: September 03, 2011, 09:36:19 PM »


I mean by Democrats in the South who only voted for McCain because they were pissed about Clinton losing (and also because he's black)

And I don't think they were a factor. Some of it had to do with the fact that he was black, and also that he was exotic and not a real Muhrican.

Political culture matters greatly. A DINO is Governor of Kentucky. A Southern moderate, populist, or conservative Democrat can win the electoral votes of Kentucky (Carter in 1976, Clinton twice) but a d@mnyankee like Kerry or Obama or a Southerner who forgets his roots loses the state except in an electoral blowout that favors the Democrat. President Obama will win Greater Louisville, but lose the rest of this very rural state.

President Obama is the definitive city-slicker of a candidate, and his failure to win certain states reflects perhaps more the rurality of those states.  than anything else except perhaps ethnic polarization. (Thus if white Mississippians voted like white Kentuckians, then President Obama would have won Mississippi). The Southern states that the President won in 2008 are very urban and suburban (Florida, North Carolina, and Virginia). He won Indiana in 2008 by doing extremely well in Indianapolis, South Bend, Gary, and such college towns as Lafayette and Bloomington. Kentucky has Louisville, Lexington, and Covington... and that is it. President Obama has yet to show that he can campaign in rural areas. In 2008 that did not matter.  On 2012 he wins nationally if he can still convince suburbanites that their problems are urban problems again.  Even though I have seen no polls for Indiana I can state confidently that President Obama has a far-better chance of winning Indiana than he has of winning Kentucky because Indiana is much more urban than is Kentucky.


In 2012, race will not matter so much. President Obama is now the most prominent of American politicians. It will be either "what have you done lately"? or "what can you promise credibly?" in 2012.



Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: September 03, 2011, 09:44:43 PM »

Kentucky has Louisville, Lexington, and Covington... and that is it.

In 2008, Obama won everything in Kentucky that's actually urban. He even won Newport, Frankfort, Henderson, Maysville, etc. And the urban percentage in Kentucky just passed the rural. Kentucky Republicans have got to be getting pretty worried right about now - if not for 2012, then certainly for 2016.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,486
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: September 03, 2011, 09:49:33 PM »

If Perry is outed (or comes out of the closet voluntarily), Obama should give it a shot. Otherwise, no.
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,637
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: September 04, 2011, 01:23:54 AM »

Do Democrats think all Republicans are gay?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.077 seconds with 13 queries.