Clinton vs. McCain → additional blue states (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 02:10:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  Clinton vs. McCain → additional blue states (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which states would have gone Democratic if Hillary had run in 2008?
#1
Alabama
#2
Alaska
#3
Arizona
#4
Arkansas
#5
Georgia
#6
Idaho
#7
Kansas
#8
Kentucky
#9
Louisiana
#10
Mississippi
#11
Missouri
#12
Montana
#13
Nebraska
#14
North Dakota
#15
Oklahoma
#16
South Carolina
#17
South Dakota
#18
Tennessee
#19
Texas
#20
Utah
#21
West Virginia
#22
Wyoming
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Clinton vs. McCain → additional blue states  (Read 7859 times)
Duke David
Atheist2006
Rookie
**
Posts: 240
Germany


« on: September 25, 2011, 04:19:55 PM »

Imagine Hillary Clinton would have won the nomination by the Democratic Party.

Which states would she have won in addition to the states that voted for Obama?

(You can click on up to all 22 options.)
Logged
Duke David
Atheist2006
Rookie
**
Posts: 240
Germany


« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2011, 04:27:00 PM »

AK, KY, TN, LA, and WV, but she loses NC and IN.

I'm pretty sure she would have won Missouri, too.

She may have lost North Carolina, but Indiana would have gone even bluer than under Obama.
Logged
Duke David
Atheist2006
Rookie
**
Posts: 240
Germany


« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2011, 03:43:46 AM »

My suggestion:



Clinton: 443
McCain:  95
Logged
Duke David
Atheist2006
Rookie
**
Posts: 240
Germany


« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2011, 01:26:31 PM »

LOL atbthe guy that said she'd take Arkansas with 60% of the vote, and win Louisiana.  Also, no Democrat was winning Kentucky and Tennessee in 2008, and a Democrat would win Texas before Appalachia.

That's why Bill Clinton didn't win one single state in Appalachia, whereas he took Texas by a wide margin. Roll Eyes
Logged
Duke David
Atheist2006
Rookie
**
Posts: 240
Germany


« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2011, 02:31:55 PM »

Missouri and Arkansas, but not by much. The interior South is less Democratic than it was in the 90s, and Hillary would be seen as further left than Bill was.

I think there's no doubt at all that Hillary would have won West Virginia.
Logged
Duke David
Atheist2006
Rookie
**
Posts: 240
Germany


« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2011, 03:19:49 PM »
« Edited: September 27, 2011, 03:23:37 PM by Atheist2006 »


In 1992, he was lost Texas because the incumbent President was from Texas.


Bill Clinton lost Texas despite the fact that there were two opponents from that state.

Even in 1996 he wasn't able to carry Texas (though Perot was still participating), whereas he won each state in the Appalachian region (+ Louisiana) in both elections.
Logged
Duke David
Atheist2006
Rookie
**
Posts: 240
Germany


« Reply #6 on: September 28, 2011, 05:28:27 AM »

15 years later, you expect his wife to do the same? 

Of course.

Recall her overwhelming performance in Appalachia during the primary season.
Logged
Duke David
Atheist2006
Rookie
**
Posts: 240
Germany


« Reply #7 on: September 29, 2011, 06:20:09 AM »


Let me remind you of the fact that all primaries in Appalachia were open.
That means every citizen was allowed to take part in the election process.
Furthermore, she performed there so outstandingly that the primaries acted as a prognostic of the general elections.
Logged
Duke David
Atheist2006
Rookie
**
Posts: 240
Germany


« Reply #8 on: October 30, 2011, 04:03:19 PM »


Hillary would definitely have won Indiana. Remember she had emerged victorious in the open IN primary, and nevertheless Obama got the electoral votes from there.
Thus, Obama's result means Hillary would have been all the more successful in the Hoosier state.
And btw, Oklahoma would have gone much more Democratic than under Obama.
Logged
Duke David
Atheist2006
Rookie
**
Posts: 240
Germany


« Reply #9 on: November 06, 2011, 07:03:26 AM »


Hillary would definitely have won Indiana. Remember she had emerged victorious in the open IN primary, and nevertheless Obama got the electoral votes from there.
Thus, Obama's result means Hillary would have been all the more successful in the Hoosier state.
And btw, Oklahoma would have gone much more Democratic than under Obama.
Hillary wouldn't have been able to match Obama's black turnout in Indiana.

What if Hillary had chosen H. Obama as her running mate?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 16 queries.