Which of the Traditional Values Coalition's 8 platform planks do you support?

[Torie]

Two: 1) Opposition to "liberal" immigration reform (reform without first securing the U.S.-Mexico border), and 2) Freedom of Christians attempt to convert non-Christians. 1) actually overstates my position a bit, but opposition is closer than support, so I checked the box.

[Torie]

Freedom to evangelize is protected by the Free Speech clause.  Of course I support that, although it would be a total waste of time to hit up me. Well maybe not. I have had some interesting conversations with some. The rest are no, just no.

[Torie]

Freedom to evangelize is protected by the Free Speech clause.  Of course I support that, although it would be a total waste of time to hit up me. Well maybe not. I have had some interesting conversations with some. The rest are no, just no.

But how far does that freedom go? Should people be allowed to spam or harass others? Personally, when people like the Traditional Values Coalition say these kinds of things, I believe they mean Christians have the freedom to proselyte to the point of harassment, while Muslims, for example, don't have that freedom. I'd support nothing this so-called coalition promotes, if only because most of its planks are fundamentally anti-democratic, anti-freedom and, dare I say, anti-American.

No, or course I don't support harassment, and personally I think knocking on someone's door to proselytize is just plain rude. Most people don't want to be disturbed by that sort of thing.