2011 Election Results Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 07:19:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2011 Election Results Thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2011 Election Results Thread  (Read 35769 times)
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


« on: November 08, 2011, 09:58:57 PM »

These results are pretty good, assuming the current votes hold in Virginia and we hold the Senate.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2011, 10:00:14 PM »

I won't rest easy until DeSoto comes in, although there's enough black counties with 0 precincts to offset it.  Very proud of Mississippi right now.

Are the black areas voting No?
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2011, 10:15:19 PM »

With almost 14,000 votes counted, Arizona state senator Pearce is behind the recall challenger Lewis by about 53% to 45%

awesome
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


« Reply #3 on: November 08, 2011, 10:46:04 PM »

CNN said there is no exact trend for tonight, but I think this is looking to be a very positive night for progressives.

Yeah, wtf? How is this not a good night for Democrats and Democratic causes?
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


« Reply #4 on: November 08, 2011, 11:05:02 PM »

Arizona Senate President Russell Pearce lost his recall to fellow Republican Jerry Lewis.

hahahahahahahahahahahah
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


« Reply #5 on: November 08, 2011, 11:26:30 PM »

What are TWEENS?
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2011, 11:34:23 AM »

The official language says it is a proposal to "preserve the freedom of Ohioans to choose their health care."

Yeah, that's completely meaningless.

It's also technically anti-medicare, since seniors don't have the "freedom to choose their health care" but instead must be enrolled in medicare. Good job Ohio Republicans.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.