"Will Rogers phenomenon" state redistricting challenge (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 09:16:32 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  "Will Rogers phenomenon" state redistricting challenge (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: "Will Rogers phenomenon" state redistricting challenge  (Read 6126 times)
dpmapper
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 442
« on: November 19, 2011, 09:35:53 AM »

Adding Omaha's county to Iowa would make both NE and IA more Republican... but would probably help Democrats on balance, by moving one electoral vote to a tilt-Dem state.  Super-paradox! 
Logged
dpmapper
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 442
« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2011, 01:15:14 PM »

Adding Omaha's county to Iowa would make both NE and IA more Republican... but would probably help Democrats on balance, by moving one electoral vote to a tilt-Dem state.  Super-paradox! 

Not really, as making two states more Republican(/Democratic) necessarily adds more population to the more Democratic(/Republican) of the two. Will Rogering states ain't a free lunch.

It's a paradox in the same way that the Will Rogers paradox is a paradox.  Smiley

But it's not always the case that making two states more D via the Will Rogers paradox will actually help the R's.  For instance, the example above where a light-blue county in Illinois goes to MO, making both states more D, would tend to help the Dems - they'll gladly trade the 1 guaranteed EV for a better shot at all of Missouri's. 

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.